 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:31
|
|
A most disturbing development, but one that was expected.
Where do we go from here? I don't know.
I think we should go ahead with our plan and tell lego to **** off. Make them declare war on us, let them take the ww hit.
I do appreciate the main forum silence however.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:31
|
|
Catching up here...
quote: Originally posted by Tall Stranger
Looking at the map, it seems that ND is a greater threat to us than GoW. It is therefore pointless to risk a war with Lego so that we can put the hurt on GoW. |
That was exactly the point of the invasion, at the time when we still envisioned a 40-50 unit landing, instead of this limited one. By taking out the weaker partner, the battle would become easier, while if we fight the stronger ally it would remain a 2-1 battle for a lot longer.
I agree it has changed now that Lego wants to join, though.
[quoteIf the Yellowknife landing was intended to force GoW into a decision, it has not worked the way we intended. It appears they now have forced us to make the choice of war with all, or agreeing to their conditions for backstabbing ND. (Yes we could move our forces south, but unless a decisive victory is possible there, what’s the point?)[/quote]
Mhh... maybe. I'm not sure if GoW would want to backstab ND... we forced the issue for sure, although I don't know by how far.
Has anyone opened the save yet, and could comment whether we were attacked, and if any Legos are in sight? It's possible this is a threat because they know we could hurt them a lot before they can react (a small possibility, I know)
quote: c) if Lego declares war, we may have no choice but to assume that all three powers have decided to gang up on GS, meaning that all hope is lost and thus we may as well take you out with us. |
I don't know about that... yes indeed, if 3 nations gang up on us, it looks grim, but we would probably be able to hold on for a very long time. All we need to do is build enough warriors and WCs, and block our coast, meanwhile putting all into economical development. Once we have enough cash and espoinage, we can steal our way back in the tech race... certainly if we can keep RP alive.
Is that fun to play the game like that? No way... but it remains winnable. The same applies for Lego, BTW, they don't need RRs to protect their coast, they only need enough forces.
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
That could work, considering that the bulk of their staff, who supports now a skirmish on foreign soil, would think twice if it came to a war at Legoland, to see some of their shiny cities razed. |
I agree it might work, but... their cities don't appear to be so shiny. Lego is far from the builders they say they are, seeing their culture rating is rather low, considering they do not have any wars to fight (yet). That could be one thought nut to crack...
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
I appreciate Togas' words, but frankly I think that he, like us, needs to simmer down and really think a bit about the situation. |
Agree. If RP keeps a forever war going, it wouldn't do any good on the team spirit in 'poly... they can of course ask for a price when accepting peace. It would certainly be the opposite world, where a civ with 1 city left needs to be paid by 2 civs owning half the world in order for them to accept peace. This might be the price for Astro, and saltpeter we need...
That being said, I still would favor to kick some ass in the North, if it is at all possible... but it looks grim.
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|