 |
|
vovan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Datajack Franit
Can't wait for Infogrames and Microids to end like that too |
Wait a minnit. Last time I checked, Microids had nothing to do with Atari. Have I missed something big? Or am I just stupid?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jamski
Right idea, wrong logic. If he's the art director, he's by definition a WORSE artist than the people he's directing. Who knows more about computers, the IT technician, or the company's IT director? Who's the better salesman, the one that goes and sells stuff, or the director of sales? I'd say this is the "Dilbert Principle" at work. Those that can, do. Those that can't... get promoted to a place where they can't do any harm.
-Jam |
More formally, its called the Peter Principle - in a hierarchical organization, people tend to get promoted to their level of incompetence (since they cease to be promoted from that point)
This is to some degree a relic of an older time when corporations didnt routinely fire middle managers - these days that happens all the time, at least in the US.
Ideally a corporation should promote to, say art director, a good artist (NOT the best) but one who has skills at management (IE art direction). Per the Peter Principle, they promote the best artist, who may be a lousy manager, but who stays at that job anyway. Per the dilbert principle, they promote the worst artist.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|