 |
| |
|
|
Elok
|
 |
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003
time: 00:32
|
|
Biotechnology is making some major progress, and in the process raising some very awkward questions about the nature of human existence. Cloning humans is the most obvious question at hand, but genetic engineering of humans and animals, finding the genes to determine specific traits, stem cells, and a whole bunch of other ideas have tremendous potential to change the way we live one way or another. There are very large groups of people who are afraid of something like Brave New World coming into being, but also equally large groups of people who dream of worlds without disease, nanotechnology, superlatively juicy steaks, etc. I don't intend to argue about whether biotech should be stopped at a certain point, or whether it's right or wrong, but the stakes are too high for both sides of the argument for the question to be ignored. How do you all think it's going to end up? I honestly wouldn't be too surprised if it meant another American civil war within a few decades. Hey, stop laughing!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999
time: 23:32
|
|
because of the puritanical streak inherent in american political life, and the sheer strength of the christian conservative right, america will lose in the biotechnology race to the rest of the world; they will be held back much as the soviets were when they refused to believe in mendelian and darwinian biology.
as for europe, because of the strength of those bloody bleeding heart liberals, even if biotechnology research is allowed (and will be, most likely, since the same puritanical streak does not exist in the same strength), fearmongers and luddites will prevent the widespread adoption of biotechnological applications.
consequently, the regions which will benefit the most (and, not inconceivably, suffer the most) from biotechnology will be in asia and africa.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cruddy
|
|
There is no "end" as such.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002
time: 05:32
|
|
Yes, the federal government has not permitted the harvesting of stem cells and has not given any money to aid in stem cell research. This has, however, not ended the endevours of researchers. California has given money to aid in the research (possibly the best thing Davis has ever done), procuders to harvest "donated" stem cells have been developed, and companies that create kits to collect, process, and examine stem cells have emerged in the US and many have created strong ties with European companies.
IMO, once the benefits of stem cell research has been fully understood by the non-scientific community, and that same community comes to understand the process it may be more acceptable to the US government. Still, we may be too far behind in the tech race already and even if accepted there will still be resistance from certain groups/factions.
One thing I know is that the government easily folds to money. When the weight of the gold is large enough, the will cave.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
You need to show people some practical benefits before embracing a quite risky undertaking.
For example, resistance against biotech will drop dramatically if it produces cures for many deadly diseases today (Alzheimer, Parkinson, MS, Cancers, etc..).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002
time: 05:32
|
|
A miss is as good as 50 million miles.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32.
Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-11-2003 20:42
|