 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999
time: 05:32
|
|
Who was the better general?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999
time: 05:32
|
|
I named my golden retriever (RIP) after Rommel.
Just thought you should know.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999
time: 05:32
|
|
You're too hard on the man, Dan. Look what he did to the English again and again with a handful of Germans and a mob of Italians! Give him half of what Patton had in material, air support, and supply and Egypt would have been his!
Also, nobody could have defended europe, Germany was already beaten by the Rooskies and the bombing. The allies had almost endless force which nothing could have competed with. This was Hitlers fault. If Patton was a German, he would have lost too, because Germany had no chance against the power of allied industry, yes?
His attack into France in '40....incredible! What a guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999
time: 05:32
|
|
"Well, his opponents were English. Not the Navy, either."
If you had said 'French', as in '40, I'd have agreed, but the English? I don't see a heck of alot of difference between English and Americans, imo. English troops are tough SOBs!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999
time: 05:32
|
|
"Yeah, but Monty was the best general they could come up with. Not exactly a ringing endorsement of their army, is it?"
He was pretty bad...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999
time: 05:32
|
|
Do bad generals make good generals then? I think Monty was bad, but Rommel was also good. Look at Napoleon, he whooped em all, good and bad, except Wellington. You could be a good general, and face Napoleon, and still get your ass handed to you. I think Monty was bad, we're agreed, but also Rommel was good, very good. He took what was basicly a holding force, and romped all over a superior army...
Can't take that away from the guy.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:32
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Lancer
You're too hard on the man, Dan. Look what he did to the English again and again with a handful of Germans and a mob of Italians! Give him half of what Patton had in material, air support, and supply and Egypt would have been his!
Also, nobody could have defended europe, Germany was already beaten by the Rooskies and the bombing. The allies had almost endless force which nothing could have competed with. This was Hitlers fault. If Patton was a German, he would have lost too, because Germany had no chance against the power of allied industry, yes?
His attack into France in '40....incredible! What a guy. |
His attack in France was as a divisional commander executing orders he was given in relation to a plan he had no hand in making.
In North Africa, he had far more than "a handful" of Germans as fast as they could be landed, his constant right hook tactics were inanely predictable, and he was successful for two reasons - a talented mathematician (Hauptmann Alfred Seebohm, commander of the 621 Military Intelligence Company, the Pazerarmee Afrika signals intercept company), and a polo-playing chap named Bonwit Fellers, a US Colonel and the military attache to the US Consulate in Cairo. Old chap Bonwit, no doubt over tea and crumpets, used to get briefed in detail by the jolly Brit social set officers on everything going on with British 8th Army and their plans. Then old chap Bonwit would inform his superiors back in Washington, using a diplomatic code broken by Seebohm. Rommel used to refer to his intercept reports from Seebohm as his "little Fellers" and used that info on Brith strengths, locations and plans to plan his attacks.
Seebohm's company was overrun by the Aussies in the beginning of the first El Alamein campaign (great general, ol' Rommel, for not having his HQ area and such a critically important unit secured), and Seebohm was mortally wounded - and even worse, the Aussies secured the company's records and current working intercepts, so old chap Fellers was relieved in disgrace and sent packing. With his information pipeline cut, Rommel never again won in Africa, and in fact he had his ass handed to him multiple times. The only reason he hung on as long as he did was old Monty and his habit of never seeing a reason to move aggressively.
Rommel was in fact so fond of running amok in his command vehicles that he often lost contact with most of his staff, and was often entirely out of radio contact with his HQ, so he effectively lost control of his battles. Rommel also had such a pathological issue with the Italians (he was fond of rubbing his Pour le Merite in the Italian's face for having won it for the fight at Longarone in the first war) that he insisted any security leaks were due to Italian "traitors" and would not change his practice of insisting on the Italians broadcasting the exact scheduled arrival times of supply convoys - no matter how often RN subs happened to show up and nail the supply vessels just outside of port.
At any level above divisional command, Rommel was thoroughly mediocre.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
|
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:32
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Darsnan
Patton, Montgomery, and the lot of British commanders before them all had the advantage in that they were reading all of Rommel's battle communiques (i.e. troop strength/ disposition, fuel shortages, convoy arrivals, etc.). For Rommel to have survived as long as he did in Africa gives testiment to his capabilities as a commander. Rommel, hands down.
D |
Convoy reports, etc., yes. Troop strength and disposition, no - Rommel was notorious about not sending out detailed reports (von Mellenthin and others addressed this), but mostly of screaming for more men and supplies.
There was only a relatively brief time between the cracking of enigma in adequate time for battlefield intelligence and Monty's replacement of Auchinleck. IIRC, Auchinleck and Wavell were never cleared for Enigma, because dissemination was limited to RN units through naval codes and strategic intelligence at their times of command of 8th Army.
It is known that 8th Army was completely surprised by deployment of the first long-gunned Panver IV's to the 10th Panzer div. so as of June-July 1942, they were not getting near real time intercepts of Enigma communications to and from Panzerarmee Afrika HQ.
If Monty was getting NRT intercepts, he sure as hell never made use of them, but by the time of the American landings in Africa, NRT intercepts were issued to allied Army commanders on a regular basis. By that time, Rommel and Panzerarmee Afrika were finished.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32.
Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-11-2003 21:23
|