 |
|
MOBIUS
|
 |
Prifysgol Caerdydd
Dec 1999 time: 15:32
|
|
quote: 'Collision'
Reuters quoted and unnamed US officer at the scene saying "one of the helicopters was hit by an RPG on the tail wing".
The agency also quoted a local man, Mohammad Badran, who said he had seen the two helicopters collide after an explosion. |
Seems like the enemy got a lucky two-for-one strike...
Which begs the question, why were they flying so closely in the 1st place!?
Last edited by MOBIUS on 16-11-2003 at 01:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Since tranport helicopters seem to be such a big prize I think we should: (1)fly them at night without running lights, making them difficult to target, (2)station our helipads in unpopulated areas, denying the attackers cover, and/or (3)provide cover for them using drones to scout the surrounding territory.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by techumseh
Who's we? |
Oh Ha Ha, you mean as in:
Lone Ranger: "It looks like the Commanches have got us surrounded, Tonto."
Tonto: "Who's we, white man?"
Last edited by Dr Strangelove on 16-11-2003 at 04:21
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:32
|
|
Chemical Ollie, well.. who would in their right minds do that.. after all that's combat and target was strictly military.. I mean sure they could call them that, but the word would lose too much credibility..
And what got them down or what didn't, should launched missile you can be in safe distance if the ground gives you some cover to move in and out. Easy to shoot, easy to hit if you're located correctly.. then again it's not guaranteed you get that 100% sure shot.. and you can shoot these babies cold too, if you are experienced and know your stuff, no problem, and the chopper will have minimum time to counter the problem. Then it won't go after new heat targets if the chopper decides to go for it. Then again that's not so easy anymore.. but you don't need to be inside 100 meter range.. well at least if you have proper stuff, and that stuff is still cheap.
I don't know what the solution to this is. Naturally it would be, that the routes used are safe and protected from the ground, but then again that's not very possible in Iraq, where resistance can move within the common people.... and the routes are not very short I'd suppose.
In that situation, I guess the flights just have to be risked. There are no sure things anyway, I guess.
But it's bad, because this gives motivation to resistance and maybe they are able to recruit more people faster when they see their small battles. Let's hope it doesn't become a trend.
For example in Afghanistan when SU fought there, guerillas brought down over 300 choppers as an aftermath. That was every chopper that was sent there. Last chopper was shot down when it was on its way back to SU because the war was kind of over. So none of the choppers came back. But then again, Afghani mountains are ideal to use those missiles. And they had plenty of them. But I suspect, that Iraqi resistance is not exactly lacking those either, and they should be able to get them more and more, from neighbouring countries that their supporters have maybe safe routes etc.
And there could be larger weapons stacks that the US didn't find, that was solely meant for the resistance to use. .. but let's hope this doesn't become a trend.
We had the opportunity to actually watch (well few of us from our group) videos from the 'library' in the army. It was interesting.. they had a video that showed mujahedins dropping those choppers there. It was very good video, and it showed how it was not very fun to fly there, when they didn't have control over the mountains. Hindis came down like blueberries.
Last edited by Pekka on 16-11-2003 at 06:23
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|