 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
If you have beef with the USDA not doing their job than you have a problem with government regulations, since the USDA is ran by the government. Thus, you support deregulation... at least from a government stand point. |
I have a problem with the fact that they've lowered the amount of regulations. There was a time when then line could be stopped to pull contaminated meat from the line. Now it has to be gross contamination.
Ned, it damn well does have to do with food regulation, as well as mine regulation, pollution regulation, and so on. I don't think we should trade with any country that doesn't have the same labor or environmental standards we have. If we did, then what's the point of having the regulations here?
Is it fair to American shrimpers they have to catch shrimp a certain way to avoid destroying the environment, but Mexican shrimpers can scour the reefs and destroy tons of by-catch. It's cheaper the Mexican way, and so we put Americans out of business for doing the right thing while allowing Mexico to take our business for destroying the oceans.
Is it fair to American workers that they have to compete against child and slave labor in the 3rd world, in countries where union organizers are freely murdered? How are we supposed to compete against slaves and children?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
NeOmega
|
 |
Play Pentagenesis Beta!
Feb 2002 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Dean said in the interview that "re-regulation" is a key tool for restoring trust. In doing so, he drew a sharp distinction with Bush, an outspoken advocate of free markets who wants to further deregulate media companies and other key sectors of the economy. |
I italicized the part I disaagree with. Bush has been a prpotectionist to say the least, not only that, he is racking up one of the largest deficits in history. A tax break will do you no good if your dollar is worthless.
Someone in this thread also called "more transparency" Bolshevism. I call that charge bullshitism. The stock market obviously needs some more stringent rules about how income and profit is reported, since it is obvious people value their positions and suits too much to tell the truth.
quote: Dean is so far left us to make Bill Clinton appear to be a hard-right republican conservative. The Bill Clinton wing of the Democratic Party must be appalled. |
Of course, the conservatives are going to start trying everything they can to make dean look like an extremist, which he most definitely is not.
Having said all that, and without seeing the specifics of his plan, I don't know if I am ready to jump ship yet. I cannot in a sensible frame of mind say all regulation is bad, all though that is my party line. And, Dean was against the war, which earns him about 10000 extra points.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by NeOmega
Last time I didn't hate Gore enough to worry about my vote making Bush lose.
This time, I'll vote Democrat, (something I would have never imagined even 4 years ago) just to voice my extreme hatred of Bush. Clinton commited most of his idiocy's within our own borders. I disagreed with his Balkan foreign policy strongly, but not nearly to the degree with which I disagree with Bush.
I'll vote Libertarian if anyone else is running for the D's.... including Clark, who was too hawkish during Kosovo. |
You sound like a rather confused chap...debating whether to support Dean or the Libertarians? They are practically polar opposites.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Pro-gun anti-war is libertarian enough for me this time around. |
Other reasons for a libertarian to support Dean:
-His campaign is actually democratic! It's a grass-roots campaign, not run by a bunch of corporations and other entrenched interests that the Republicans and Democrats stand for. Voting for Dean in 2004 means revolutionizing politics - and the possibily to vote for Browne, etc., down the line. This is probably the biggest reason I'm supporting him. I don't like quoting politicians, but as Dean said, I want my country back! 
-He's a step forward on ending the war on drugs. Not a huge step, and he's been doing some considerable waffling on this issue, but he seems to want to somewhat scale back prison time for using drugs. For instance, he's said he'd support a moratorium on medical marijuana raids.
-As I just wrote, he's said he'd scale back agrisubsidies to only family-farms.
-He's argued for a less extremist position on a wide variety of foreign policy issues from Colombia to Israel.
-He's argued for far less corporate welfare in general.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Adam Smith
|
 |
Maryland, USA
Jan 1970 time: 00:32
|
|
Has anybody seen what these regulations look like? You can find them HERE.
Here are some representative regulations that I am most familiar with - railroad safety regulations. As you can see, they go on for hundreds adn hundreds of pages. And I can tell you, from having actually done the analysis, that there is zero, zip, nada, not any correlation between increased enforcement of these regulations and improved railroad safety.
49CFR213.63
(c) Each 39 foot segment of: Class 1 track shall have five crossties; Classes 2 and 3 track shall have eight crossties; Classes 4 and 5 track shall have 12 crossties; and Class 6 track shall have 14 crossties which are not:
(1) Broken through;
(2) Split or otherwise impaired to the extent the crossties will allow the ballast to work through, or will not hold spikes or rail fasteners;
(3) So deteriorated that the tie plate or base of rail can move laterally more than ½ inch relative to the crossties;
(4) Cut by the tie plate through more than 40 percent of a tie’s thickness.
(d) Class 1 and Class 2 track shall have one crosstie whose centerline is within 24 inches of the rail joint location, and Classes 3 through 6 track shall have one crosstie whose centerline is within 18 inches of the rail joint location .
....
49CFR229.75 Wheels and tire defects.
Wheels and tires may not have any of the following conditions:
[[Page 303]] 
(a) A single flat spot that is 2\1/2\ inches or more in length, or two adjoining spots that are each two or more inches in length.
(b) A gouge or chip in the flange that is more than 1\1/2\ inches in length and \1/2\ inch in width.
(c) A broken rim, if the tread, measured from the flange at a point five-eighths inch above the tread, is less than 3\3/4\ inches in width.
(d) A shelled-out spot 2\1/2\ inches or more in length, or two adjoining spots that are each two or more inches in length.
(e) A seam running lengthwise that is within 3\3/4\ inches of the flange.
(f) A flange worn to a \7/8\ inch thickness or less, gauged at a point \3/8\ inch above the tread.
(g) A tread worn hollow \5/16\ inch or more on a locomotive in road service or \3/8\ inch or more on a locomotive in switching service.
(h) A flange height of 1\1/2\ inches or more measured from tread to the top of the flange.
(i) Tires less than 1\1/2\ inches thick.
(j) Rims less than 1 inch thick on a locomotive in road service or less than \3/4\ inch on a locomotive in yard service.
(k) A crack or break in the flange, tread, rim, plate, or hub.
(l) A loose wheel or tire.
(m) Fusion welding may not be used on tires or steel wheels of locomotives, except for the repair of flat spots and worn flanges on locomotives used exclusively in yard service. A wheel that has been welded is a welded wheel for the life of the wheel.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|