 |
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: have power, they have words. Power is the difference between racism and prejudice. I have the power to benifit from race prejudice, i.e., I benefit from racism. People can make assuptions about my character because I'm white, but when it comes down to it, I have more power over them than they do over me. |
Not necessarily. There are laws against discrimination by race and gender, and you probably won't find any trouble finding some ultraultraPC group to foot a lawyer's bill for you.
Even if you can't sue an employer for race discrimination, at least you can ***** about it for millenia on end. Let me give you some examples, to show you what I mean:
-Black man "John Q Doe" isn't hired by white employer "James Smith". He takes up the oppurtunity whenever possible to ***** on endlessly about it, and/or files a race discrimination lawsuit when a similarly skilled white man gets the job.
-White man "John Q Doe" isn't hired by black employer "James Smith." He takes up the oppurtunity whenever possible to ***** on endlessly about it, and/or files a race discrimination lawsuit when a smilarly skilled black man gets the job.
-For the purpose of this discussion, assume the employer actually was a hothead racist bastard, in both instances where he was black and white.
A few questions:
-Which man will be taken more seriously? The white man or the black man?
-Is it fair that we treat the black man's case more seriously than the white man's case?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:32
|
|
Does 'race' still matter orange?
It does in Australia. If you're an Aborigine you won't see people like you advertising things on television. You won't see people like you reading the news. You might see an occasional sporting celebrity, or politician, but that's it. You probably won't have mains electricity, or running water, you won't have the same life expectancy, you will have had a range of childhood diseases eradicated or prevented in white or non-white children, you will live in sub-standard housing, you will be more likely to develop alcoholism, your children will be more likely to encounter problems with chroming or glue sniffing or petrol sniffing. You won't be treated with respect and you will have people like Pauline Hanson complaining about state hand outs and money being wasted on you.
I think some of the people on the course meant well- but telling people that 'people of colour' can't be racist is so 1980s. I'm sure that the parents of some of my Viet Namese or Chinese friends would die of apoplexy at the thought of their children coming home with a black partner. But that's not the point- as long as there are unscrupulous people seeking to exploit supposed racial differences then 'diversity' training for all its faults, is a good thing.
By the way, if you looked 'indian' and were from South America you'd probably be hacked off if some idjit had mistaken you for a janitor, especially if you studied hard and sacrificed to get where you were. Your first thought wouldn't be the dignity of labour and the Rights of Man.
Now you might say you judge people as individuals, and I applaud you for that. I hope to treat people as individuals too, but other people don't. As a friend of mine said, when people get upset at her, it's usually a short time before the 'black' thing comes out of the bag:
'You black this, you black that....'
As Carol said- "What, they're telling me I'm black? Like I just found out?"
If you want to stigmatize someone treating them as a 'colour' or a 'race' or even now as a combination of 'race' and religion is the easiest way to dehumanize them and stop thinking of them as an individual or a human being.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by mrmitchell
A few questions:
-Which man will be taken more seriously? The white man or the black man?
-Is it fair that we treat the black man's case more seriously than the white man's case? |
You make an assumption that isn't necessarily true. It depends greatly on the listener. The further to the right one is, the more likely they are to believe the reverse of what you write. I almost never see Caligastia or the diplomat or others of their ilk post about racist discrimination that happens to Black people, but oh, let a white person claim they've been a victim of discrimination and we don't hear the end of it.
Anyway, racism in employment isn't quite so blatent, most of the time. Sure, there are places like Denny's of Cracker Barrel (name should be a clue, folks) that have a repeated probelm with race. When I worked for Wag's (a competitor of Denny's that was bought out by Shoney's in the 90s), they had an unwritten policy of no minorities in management. We actually had one Hispanic manager, but he got less than $1 above minimum wage, when all the rest of the managers got more. Well, how do you prove something unwritten like that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
Does 'race' still matter orange?
It does in Australia. If you're an Aborigine you won't see people like you advertising things on television. You won't see people like you reading the news. You might see an occasional sporting celebrity, or politician, but that's it. You probably won't have mains electricity, or running water, you won't have the same life expectancy, you will have had a range of childhood diseases eradicated or prevented in white or non-white children, you will live in sub-standard housing, you will be more likely to develop alcoholism, your children will be more likely to encounter problems with chroming or glue sniffing or petrol sniffing. You won't be treated with respect and you will have people like Pauline Hanson complaining about state hand outs and money being wasted on you.
I think some of the people on the course meant well- but telling people that 'people of colour' can't be racist is so 1980s. I'm sure that the parents of some of my Viet Namese or Chinese friends would die of apoplexy at the thought of their children coming home with a black partner. But that's not the point- as long as there are unscrupulous people seeking to exploit supposed racial differences then 'diversity' training for all its faults, is a good thing.
By the way, if you looked 'indian' and were from South America you'd probably be hacked off if some idjit had mistaken you for a janitor, especially if you studied hard and sacrificed to get where you were. Your first thought wouldn't be the dignity of labour and the Rights of Man.
Now you might say you judge people as individuals, and I applaud you for that. I hope to treat people as individuals too, but other people don't. As a friend of mine said, when people get upset at her, it's usually a short time before the 'black' thing comes out of the bag:
'You black this, you black that....'
As Carol said- "What, they're telling me I'm black? Like I just found out?"
If you want to stigmatize someone treating them as a 'colour' or a 'race' or even now as a combination of 'race' and religion is the easiest way to dehumanize them and stop thinking of them as an individual or a human being. |
I have to disagree with leftie handouts.
giving people things is not the way to make them happier in life. Working and supporting yourself is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Of course its not fair. I shouldn't be paid more because I have a piece of flesh dangling between my legs, but that's the way it is.
|
Wow. I've got a pair of gonads and an erectile tube between mine. Frankly I think you deserve some compensation for being mutilated. Would you like to talk about how it happened? Sometimes that helps.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Frankly I can agree with the idea that the black girl should be allowed to talk about problems with the black RA, but the white person should be required to bring his/her problems to his/her assigned RA even if that RA is another color. The black girl needs racial sensitivity from her counselor, while the white person probably doesn't. OTOH, if a white student has a really big issue about dealing with black authority figures it would probably be prudent to let them talk it over with a white RA.
I think Che has hit on a crucial problem. If the program is going to tackle problems like addressing racial issues it should be guided by someone who has more experience with people.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
orange
|
 |
It doesn't matter what your name is!
Feb 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
Does 'race' still matter orange?
[quote]It does in Australia. If you're an Aborigine you won't see people like you advertising things on television. |
Oh c'mon now...the reason for that is obviously economics. What population of Australia is native? I'll tell you...about 1%. Furthermore, Aboriginies are some of the poorest people on this planet. It would be financial suicide to try to appeal to native Australians as a market because you wouldn't make a dime of it back. It has nothing to do with 'racism'. It's that people would prefer not to waste money. If there were a greater number of Aboriginies, and they had more economic power, you'd see more of them in advertisements, and you'd certainly see more people trying to appeal to them as a market. For now, Australian ad agencies will stick to advertising to the overwhelming majority (90%) of white Europeans.
Perfect example is here in the US. Native Americans make up about 2% of the population, and once again are quite poor over all, while African Americans make up about 13% of the population, and have far greater economic power than Native Americans. While they too are less powerful, economically, than European Americans, they have enough Economic power to be a targeted market of consumers. McDonalds, Lugz, MTV, Foot Locker, hell...FUBU ("For Us By Us") and BET ("Black Entertainment Television")...who are they appealing to in their ads? It's completely economic. The advertising industry thinks with its wallet.
quote: You won't see people like you reading the news. You might see an occasional sporting celebrity, or politician, but that's it. You probably won't have mains electricity, or running water, you won't have the same life expectancy, you will have had a range of childhood diseases eradicated or prevented in white or non-white children, you will live in sub-standard housing, you will be more likely to develop alcoholism, your children will be more likely to encounter problems with chroming or glue sniffing or petrol sniffing. You won't be treated with respect and you will have people like Pauline Hanson complaining about state hand outs and money being wasted on you. |
But the same could be said of whites who live in poor conditions. Yes, I understand that most minorities are of the lower echelons of the economic world, especially in America, but that doesn't mean that race and economics are equal determinants of where you'll end up in life.
quote: I think some of the people on the course meant well- but telling people that 'people of colour' can't be racist is so 1980s. I'm sure that the parents of some of my Viet Namese or Chinese friends would die of apoplexy at the thought of their children coming home with a black partner. |
Exactly, and that's also racist.
quote: But that's not the point- as long as there are unscrupulous people seeking to exploit supposed racial differences then 'diversity' training for all its faults, is a good thing. |
Not when it is conducted in this way. It only turns people off to the topic, and makes people resent it even more. I should not have to pay for the idiocy of others who look like me, just as black people should not be held accountable for the actions of people who look like them.
quote: By the way, if you looked 'indian' and were from South America you'd probably be hacked off if some idjit had mistaken you for a janitor, especially if you studied hard and sacrificed to get where you were. Your first thought wouldn't be the dignity of labour and the Rights of Man. |
But that's wrong! I know I wouldn't feel that way now if someone thought I was a janitor. I would just tell them that I wasn't. Same as if someone thought I had an 'important' job.
quote: Now you might say you judge people as individuals, and I applaud you for that. I hope to treat people as individuals too, but other people don't. As a friend of mine said, when people get upset at her, it's usually a short time before the 'black' thing comes out of the bag:
'You black this, you black that....' |
I don't do that, and I think it's absolutely wrong.
quote: If you want to stigmatize someone treating them as a 'colour' or a 'race' or even now as a combination of 'race' and religion is the easiest way to dehumanize them and stop thinking of them as an individual or a human being. |
Well I don't do that, so why I should I be thought of as a racist just because I'm white?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
orange
|
 |
It doesn't matter what your name is!
Feb 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi Orange, do you have to be a Hall advisor? Surely there could be another option. |
Do I have to be? No.
Do I want to be? Yes, and I'm busting my ass to get it. There's a bit of a rule that you can't be a first year hall director if you'll also be student teaching, but it's been done by those who really step it up and show they're able. I've been doing just that.
Not only would it REALLY help me out in paying back loans after I graduate (HDs make about 4 times as much as RAs) but it would also give me some credibility as a professional and something to put on my resumé. I'm already qualified to do it now (in fact, as the "Administrative Coordinator" for my part of campus, most people think I already do the HD job)
quote: These groups that you talk about, black people wanting to hang out with black people to be 'understood' just reinforces perceptions of racism. I really don't care where you come from, I'll talk with you and I don't need to go to my little group of 'white' people when I need to be comforted. |
I agree. I remember when we used to talk about "The Booth" someone said to another white RA "Well if you think it's just a black clique, why don't you come over and chat with us sometime. We're not exclusive."
Fair enough. Even though personally I wouldn't approach any table unless I knew someone there and had something to say to them. So one of my friends who is particularly outgoing says "Wait a minute, I did that, and no one talked to me. No one introduced me. They acted as if I wasn't there at all." He actually did know someone there (another RA) and went to talk to him, and then tried to get into a conversation, and he said he felt as if the people were just looking at him as if he had no right to be there. Very unwelcoming.
I'm not saying all black people do that, I'm just saying even when people (of any race) do try to break down those imaginary walls, sometimes they aren't welcomed anyway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:32
|
|
I think orange makes very good points. I also think that "diversity training" is absolutely idiotic. I'm not going to act differently around you just because you might have been oppressed in the past. I tend to have a very sarcastic sense of humor, for example, and if you don't know me, you might think I'm an *******. That isn't the case. People who know me don't think so, and I don't care what others think. I'm not going to forego making a sarcastic comment or observation about something that just happened because I fear offended someone - I'll rag on Jesse Jackson, John F. Kennedy, Michael Jackson, Martin Luther King Jr., Dubya, myself, you, and Mother Teresa if the opportunity presents itself. **** the diversity training.
Well, that's my viewpoint 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|