 |
|
Dominae
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Yahweh Sabaoth
I really want to finally play an AU game. This is a good "jumping on" point. But I can't find the damn thread regarding the AU game that's apparently going on anywhere!
|
If it's not at the top of the Strat forum, the latest AU course is probably not up yet (unless you only check the board every few weeks). You can always go to the AU History 101 to make sure. badams52 has been very good in updating it.
Check this thread for an explanation of why the first C3C AU course is not up yet.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Double-post.
Last edited by Dominae on 21-11-2003 at 21:39
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Stuie
The only problem with this is that I, as a player, often sell techs to the AI at bargain rates just to keep them bankrupt. So if they can only pay 10 gpt, but if they had the money they'd give me 80 gpt, why should I accept only 5gpt?
|
That's some weird reasoning.
How much would you get from the AI if you were playing Play the World? Answer: 10 gpt.
How much would you get from the AI if you were playing Conquests? Answer: 10gpt + 10gpt (bug) = 20 gpt.
How much should ask from the AI to make sure you're not exploiting the gpt bug? Answer: 5gpt.
So, unless you think there was somehow a problem with the AI not giving you enough money in Play the World, you should have no problem asking for half as much gpt in Conquests, which gets you exactly as much as you would normally get. The fact that the AI would pay more has nothing to do with it.
The problem is that the AI is still left with 5gpt, while in Play the World it would be left with nothing (maybe this is what you were getting at and I missed it). This makes the AI richer, but it also makes you richer, because every 1gpt that the AI has is actually worth 2gpt to you. So you if you're in a tech lead you can make some ridiculous money (i.e. double what you normally would) even when you're selling stuff at half price, given that you have enough items to sell. So it seems that the problem you were suggesting is actually bad for the AI, not for you.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Right, well, read the comments in the last paragraph of my last post. The fact that you're getting twice as rich far outweighs the fact that the AI gets to keep a measly few gpt available.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Stuie
I guess others see it differently. It's not a big deal; I'll just wait for a patch if AU is going to implement house rules that negate some strategic part of the my play style.
|
Here's an example:
Say an AI has 16gpt available. You want to get as much of that away from it as possible. You can offer Steam Power, Nationalism and Medicine, plus a source of Iron. Obviously the AI will pay up to 16gpt for any of those things. You organize the following trades (with the house rule we've just set up):
1. Steam Power for 8gpt. The AI has 8gpt left.
2. Nationalism for 4gpt. The AI has 4gpt left.
3. Medicine for 2gpt. The has 2gpt left.
4. Iron for 1gpt. The AI has 1gpt left.
At the end of this, you've almost succeeded in your goal of taking away all the AI's gpt. But how much are you earning? It should be 15gpt, but actually it's double that, or 30gpt. Under Play the World it would be no more than 16gpt. So, as you can see, in the situation you're describing (where you're powerful enough to take away all the AIs' gpt), the benefit actually goes to you, not the AI, despite the house rule.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ducki
|
|
I think Stuie's point is valid and I understand the point of a House Rule here, but in this situation, the HR actually defeats the purpose of this specific strategy.
The strategy is to make sure the AI doesn't have any money to spend as opposed to enriching the player.
The HR is to ensure that the player doesn't get extra money, not to prevent impoverished AIs.
It's an ugly bug, but the HR against enriching the player also emasculates the strategy of impoverishing the AI. Yes, the player still receives the same amount of gold he would without the HR, but the strategy is useless now, since the AI still has half his income.
If only there were some way to take the extra income and essentially toss it in the sea...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Well, you can always rush stuff then sell it. But somehow I doubt anyone is willing to micromanage to cover up Firaxis' mistakes.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|