 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
Sure looks that way.
Gephardt HAS to win in Iowa to survive, and even if does he still has to build momentum somewhere else. Kerry looks likely to lose in NH and disappear. Clarks out of Iowa, in real bad shape in NH, and not really coming together. Edwards looks in very bad shape, a loss in SC would eliminate him. Joe maybe most likely to survive as not-Dean, but hes not catching fire, and doesnt appeal to the Clinton-McAullife establishment, unlikely to pull out nomination.
Dean, OTOH, could eliminate 2 or 3 rivals with wins in Iowa and NH, and has most money, and strongest org, and has gotten key union endorsements.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
I am sorry, but if Bush wins it will not be due to any of his actions, but the points of view he represents- there is just so much to attack this white house on, specially it's "pledge to bring back integrity"..I mean, when the military press satrts to villify your "pro-military" administration..what positives are left?
If the country is in a Bush state of mind, then no democract could win..and if they aren't, any dem, save Sharpton, Kusinich and Mosely-Brown (probalby misspelled, but so what?) |
Im quite sure there will be fence sitters for whom it will matter who the Dem is.
In any case I was hoping to discuss the horserace on the Dem side, not the general election.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:32
|
|
Kerry threw away his leader-status, Edwards has gone nowhere, neither have Lieberman and Gephardt and Clarcke has gone back down..
1. The south does not matter in the internal dmeocratic race (honestly, there is little the dems can do to win most of it-Florida, Georgia and North Carolina maybe, but most of the deep south, why even try unless black turnout was the largest ever), so the canard that only a southern democract can make it won;t work too much..
2. Iraq- Gephardt and Lieberman are the two most encumbered by this war, given that both are the most enthusiastic dem supporters in the race. Continually justifying the war (just like Bush) won;t get them far with the people who will vote in Dem primaries.
3. Trade- This is where gephardt has the most strenght, with unions, but he has not kept up on other issues. None of the other candidates have done much, save Dean, who now has the big unions with him.
It boils down to grassroots and party faithfull support- Dean has shown he has a base simply by how much he has raised from so many. None of the other dems, even with party institutional support, have shown anything like an energized support base.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
1. The south does not matter in the internal dmeocratic race (honestly, there is little the dems can do to win most of it-Florida, Georgia and North Carolina maybe, but most of the deep south, why even try unless black turnout was the largest ever), so the canard that only a southern democract can make it won;t work too much..
|
the south matter cause it has a lot of delegates. But if somebody comes out dominant in the north, and no one is dominant in the south that doesnt matter. Re the general election. Dems may only be able to win a few southern states, but those states are still crucial to an electoral college majority.
quote:
2. Iraq- Gephardt and Lieberman are the two most encumbered by this war, given that both are the most enthusiastic dem supporters in the race. Continually justifying the war (just like Bush) won;t get them far with the people who will vote in Dem primaries.
|
And the timing is very bad for Joe and Gephardt. Even if Iraq turns around, it may be in time to help Bush, but not in time to help Dem hawks, given the early weighting of the primary season. (BTW - in my more paranoid conspiratorial moments it strikes me that it would be to Bush's advantage to hold back any intell that justifies the Iraq war - like eviedence of WMD - till AFTER Dean had locked up the nomination - farfetched I know, but Im not sure id put it past this White House - at least Karl Rove)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|