 |
|  |
 |
|
Kull

|
|
El Paso, TX USA
Mar 1999 time: 22:13
|
|
Here's a recommendation to ensure that games last more than a turn or two:
(Assume a five person game)
1) Player1 opens play and saves the game as .NET
2) Player1 emails the game to ALL FOUR of the other players.
3) IMPORTANT: The email should be date stamped with the current time and date using Greenwich Mean Time. This establishes the baseline.
4) Player2 has exactly twenty four hours from that baseline time to complete his game and mail it off to ALL OTHER PLAYERS. In fact, every player will ALWAYS email their saved game to everyone else.
5) If Player3 DOES NOT receive the game before the deadline, he may launch the game and allow the AI to take over for Player2.
6) 48 hours from the deadline, Player4 is authorized to begin play using the LAST GAME he received (be it the email from Player1, 2, or 3).
7) 72 hours from the deadline, Player5 is authorized to begin play using the LAST GAME he received (be it the email from Player1, 2, 3, or 4).
8) Repeat for Round Two
For subsequent rounds, players may either use the original baseline as a PERMANENT date, or reset it every time Player1 sends out an email (unless HE is the laggard, in which case you return to the last established baseline.) The second option may be preferred, since it allows for the possibility of games moving along at a faster pace. A third option would be the establishment of a new 24 hour baseline with EVERY email, but that could get confusing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mao
|
|
Apolyton
Jun 1999 time: 00:13
|
|
I'd think Sparta would be a very good scenario to play. It uses only a small map and is pretty fun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
kIndal
|
 |
de la taifa de Almería, Spain.
Oct 2000 time: 06:13
|
|
Well, doubling the production could be a problem with the pollution, but I think that will be no problem if we turn off the pollution in this game.
Shaka, you can start the game (I think that you will play with the Empire, won´t you? ), then Henrik with Swedish and me, with France (Well, if I´ll lose, i won´t be very sad )
Shaka, I have sent you an email.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
kIndal
|
 |
de la taifa de Almería, Spain.
Oct 2000 time: 06:13
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Shaka Naldur on 03-05-2001 04:27 PM
and at the end of your turn you have to push Ctrl+N
 |
When the game say "push enter to continue the turn" or something like that???
quote:

I think that double production is a good idea
 |
Ok, but do we switch off the pollution?
quote:

we should disband Charles and the French King units, just to be more fair with Henrik
 |
grrrr, too kind 
quote:

let me know and I´ll start the game
 |
When you answer these last question I think that is ok for me.
Henrik in fact we start being allies, so I hope your helpings against the evil Habsburgs, well, Shaka we can be friends, too, only let me to carry some small armies to Castile, Aragon, Low Countries and Austria to show my friendship with you
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Shaka Naldur
|
 |
Castellón, Spain
May 2000 time: 06:13
|
|
hey guys,
I think that you are talking too much about that alliance alliance
I´m not going to last that long fighting against two countries, the Empire is not that powerful,
in the first turns I´m going to loose some cities in north spain and surely in flandes and my economic situatin is awful, is really bad.
I changed the scn file and the events file,
I created another genius units for the three human player and an event that everytime a genius is killed another is created,
I also changed the alliance between sweden and france, (come on guys, you are gonna kill in just a few turns if not)
I think it´s better a total war, the three against the three
I´ll start the game with those settings
double production and emperor level,
so do you want diplomacy between the three human players?? I completely disagree but you are majority
what do you think??
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Henrik
|
 |
The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Dec 2000 time: 06:13
|
|
Sounds good to me, still since I am the junior partner of a French-Swedish Alliance I am going to have a harder time whitout help 
The Polish are still rather strong during this time period and I'm not allowed to conquer Estonia or Denmark, so I am going to be very hampered whitout that aliance... 
Still, if you can remove the protestant unit in copenhagen or/and remove the limitations of expansion in Estonia I will accept the no alliance tingie...
The Genuis thing seems ok whit me though, where will those extra ones be situated?
I could have one in Stockholm and one in Göteborg (being equally important), a funny thing about this scenario that I didn't think of before is this Jesus: Göteborg was founded Gustav II Adolf/Gustavus Adolphus (but grew very quickly, most of it's inhabitants where English or Dutch merchants, so the economy of this one city was great just a few years after its founding) but the city could be renamed to Älvsborg (a city/town that was situated a little awat from the place that became Göteborg, it became the plaement of the coastal fortifications of Göteborg later (Älvsborgs Fästning))... 
[This message has been edited by Henrik (edited March 08, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|