 |
|  |
 |
|
Ninja Kid
|
|
Bavarian, Passau
Jul 2003 time: 06:32
|
|
Hatte das schon vor zwei Zügen geschrieben, dass P4 nur strategisch gut ist.
C5 und C3 sind näher und besser. Die Grenzstadt P4 kann noch etwas warten.
Also, lass de Siedler nach C3 gehen.
I have wrote for two turns that P4 is only good for stategy.
C5 and C3 are near and the city can quick build and we have a good land around.
So, send our settler to C3. The boarder city at P4 should be build later.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
bongo

|
 |
TRBNGR
Sep 1999 time: 06:32
|
|
1. Asskicker – SS horsi appears, whatever, we attack barbnest - success, lost 1 hp, gained 25g
2. Waterboy –
3. Uday - n, paralell with settler
4. Jags are fun - n,w see LL warrior again(boring)
5. Dangeresque – * see next post s,sw
6. Steve - rest one turn to heal, two barb warriors nearby
7. Other -
8. NEW SETTLER - (towards P4), no it's not, go east, setle there next turn(c3)
9. New JW from 3rd city- renamed to lada - s,s,w
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ninja Kid
|
|
Bavarian, Passau
Jul 2003 time: 06:32
|
|
Sorry bongo, I meen P1 or P5!
That's really good places for cities.
C3 is imho a little bit too close by the capital.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ninja Kid
|
|
Bavarian, Passau
Jul 2003 time: 06:32
|
|
Ach so!
Nur temporär - hat das mal wer durch gerechnet, ob das auch klappt?
Ich meine, C3 wird Felder von unserer Hauptstadt benutzen.
Kann unserer Hauptstadt dann noch die Siedlerproduktion so aufrecht erhalten, wie geplant?
Have anyone calculate when C3 takes profit from the city fields of our capitital, whether our settler calculation for the capital is already ok?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|