 |
|  |
 |
|
Trifna
|
 |
of anchovies
Jul 2001 time: 13:32
|
|
This thread is about logistic pertaining to the Civ IV List.
1-
Hey, we'll need to organize this thread about the Civ IV wishlist so that that it doesn't become a big mess. First, is someone making a compilation so that it is all put in its place? Second, should we make a few threads, each one discussing a different aspect (economy, troops...)?
How SHOULD it be organized to be optimal?
2-
The List done with Civ III had, I think, one weakness: how could the developers know what players gave more importance to? Perhaps some way of puting some hierarchy into the ideas could be helpful. Some of these things are easy to implement AND crucial while some others are more complicated and accessory.
PS: I also agree with Jon Miller on page 2 of the wishlist and mostly disagree with the ideas he quoted :P
Last edited by Trifna on 07-12-2003 at 03:56
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Trifna
|
 |
of anchovies
Jul 2001 time: 13:32
|
|
Nikolai: Ok, well for my several threads, I lurned that it seems that I'm the only one willing to put some time on something still not announced :P
Thanks for saying me how it works optimally, and here's one thing I believe could be better:
Let's simply put some priorities. Perhaps a five stars system or something...
Last edited by Trifna on 07-12-2003 at 23:06
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asmodean
|
 |
Aarhus, Denmark
Aug 1999 time: 06:32
|
|
Well, I was thinking that since this is going to be a monumental task, we'd have category managers for each category. The manager is responsible for his/her own thread - i.e. collecting ideas, and presenting them in a comprehensive format.
I have gotten the go ahead from MarkG to make threads for every category, but before we do that, I think we should have a sign-up thread, where would-be managers can express their interest in different categories. The category managers can then make their own threads for ideas.
Tomorrow I will take all ideas from the ideas thread, and make word documents for each category, so that each category manager wont have to comb through the same thread. Seems kinda redundant to me 
I also expect to make the sign-up thread tomorrow, so that we can get this show on the road 
Asmodean
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
we should do it as the civ3 list
as a list of ideas
not as some sort of design doc for a game
they are the ones designing the game, we are just throwing ideas there way (because sometimes we might think of something they haven't)
as far as volunteering goes, I am against it
I think we should just ahve threads that Firaxis, if they choose, can read and see what different people here think
JOn Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
but I still maintain that we are not trying to make a design doc
I am sure that I am not trying to
if someone wants to clean up the suggestions, fine by me
but making a design doc is something totally different than suggesting ideas
it is actually totally different
with one, firaxis gets a bunch of ideas that they can weigh and decide what works best with their vision, with the other there are only a limited number of ideas that are all linked and might not fit at all with firaxis's vision
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
who determines must have and the like?
all that sort of thing is different on a per person base
and remember that we here at apolyton are not length and breadth of the civiverse (so a poll cuoldn't decide things either)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I still think that everything should be included
no matter how improbable you or anyone else thinks that it is
and remember, not all civers come to civ sites
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Fosse
|
|
U.S.A.
Mar 2002 time: 23:32
|
|
I'm in Jon's boat on this one. We shouldn't have to tell Firaxis what is beyond their capabilities or what a good idea is.
I am all for the list being as organized as possible by catagories, and having polls like the current stacked vs. unit combat, and what have you. But I think that we will naturally rule out the poor ideas through discussion.
If I suggest that the first Civ 4 expansion pack be "Streets of Civlization" and that the player should be able to drive chariots or tanks (depending on tech!) around their empire... well... it doesn't have to be in grey text for Firaxis to know that it isn't what everybody wants.
I would support that a few people become editors of the list, who occasionally start threads with the topical headings (The List: Immigration, vol. 3) that summarize the debates and whatever consensus the previous discussions turn out.
But I don't want us to start excising one idea because it doesn't mesh with another. We should be the "brainstorm."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Fosse
|
|
U.S.A.
Mar 2002 time: 23:32
|
|
If people want to volunteer to go crazy with color then that's fine, as long as nobody expects average Joe List Poster to start ranking his ideas and coding them appropriatly. That sort of thing would simply discourage many posts who don't want to do it "incorrectly."
Personally, I think that simply having the different discussions in the different topics, with a volunteer providing semi-regular summaries of what the discussions have been, will be more than enough. I'm assuming, of course, that the volunteers would be balanced and include all important discussion points.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I am extremely against color coding ideas
I don't think that we are representative of the average Civ player
I don't think that we know what is capable or what is neccesary
those are all things that Firaxis should handle
and are not our place
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I know a lot of mass market people who played and enjoyed Civ3
I knew even more who enjoyed Civ2
Civ is a massmarket phenomenum
and Firaxis must make something that they will want to play
MOO3s downfall was trying to follow the wishes of the people in their forums
I don't want Civ4 to follow it
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Fosse
|
|
U.S.A.
Mar 2002 time: 23:32
|
|
Given the opinion of the people on the forums, I'd think that you'd be hard pressed to prove that Firaxis did what they wanted, but that's beside the point.
Having a managed list is fine, and if people want to label those ideas that are most appealing to the most people with color, fine. Just don't expect the average poster to have to compy. If thread editors are willing and able to objectivly organize such things then more power to them. Those of us who see no need for such things can simply continue to contribute as we have been since we found out about Civ 4's green light.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|