 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Ah adding that winking smilie next to the scared after my post I see. Very good.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
17 November never was a real threat to the Greek people.
It was born after the Junta and it's first assasinations were Junta torturers that were left free by Greek "justice" of the time and the CIA stationed Chief. US government supported the Junta. So why would the Greek people (those of democratic believes at least) fear or oppose them?
As for how the US handled things, exactly as 17 November hoped for.
Nevertheless after the first assassinations it quickly lost its "appeal".
Last edited by Bereta_Eder on 09-12-2003 at 04:53
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Funilly enough they didn't actually get convicted for killing the CIA chief or the Junta torturers because after 20 years of action those crime were erased.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
quote: 17 November never was a real threat to the Greek people. |
I said that
quote: US government supported the Junta. So why would the Greek people fear or oppose them? |
Why would you oppose terrorists? Give me a minute with that one.
quote: As for how the US handled things, exactly as 17 November hoped for. |
How was that?
quote: Nevertheless after the first assassinations it quickly lost its "appeal". |
Not that quickly it would seem.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Funilly enough they didn't actually get convicted for killing the CIA chief or the Junta torturers because after 20 years of action those crime were erased. |
Funny that. Most crimes get obsolete, as far as I know only war crimes don't. Weird how terror acts do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
Why would you oppose terrorists? Give me a minute with that one. |
I already answered that. Go and check it out
Turned against the whole country and childlishly overblowing the subject out of proportions. Thinking about conspiracy theories and other paranoia.
quote: Not that quickly it would seem. |
Quickly enough I'd say.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Also, you are underestimating the real impact of not actually targeting everyday people.
It wasn't Al Qaeda, if it was you bet you'd have seen much more than mere indifference.
Also its proclamations were overly populist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Also, you are underestimating the real impact of not actually targeting everyday people.
It wasn't Al Qaeda, if it was you bet you'd have seen much more than mere indifference.
Also its proclamations were overly populist. |
You should understand that I am not 'attacking' 17N.
But it is really interesting how both you and MarkG feel the need to defend them (ok I understand about you since you used to praise them)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I didn't use to praise them unless you're talking about either trolling or (most propably) your own ineptitude to understand what's being said.
Also you again got it wrong. I'm not defending 17N, I'm explaining the things you say make an "impression" to you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
You know when I saw you were trolling I never thought you'd be telling the truth. |
If 23 people dead in 30 years is a terrorist heaven, I wonder what 2,500 or so dead in a couple of hours is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Who said you did?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
I was talking about.. how should I say.. intellectual integrity? If you have two clear facts, add them up and draw a conclusion. It won't always be pleasant but you owe it to yourself.
And self-delusion, also a crime against reason.
If BBC says 17N used to have silent popular support, and you say it had not, while having written positively about them yourself, who should I trust?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
Examples? Read this thread.
MarkG says only 23 dead in 30 years, hardly worth mention... |
I think what he said is that this hardly equates a country into being a terrorist heaven. With the same logic US is the world's best terrorist paradise.
So obviously it doesn't really hold water. Get it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
I was talking about.. how should I say.. intellectual integrity? If you have two clear facts, add them up and draw a conclusion. It won't always be pleasant you owe it to yourself.
And self-delusion, also a crime against reason.
If BBC says 17N used to have silent popular support, and you say it had not, while having written positively about them yourself, who should I trust? |
Point me out exactly where BBC says that.
Indifference and that up to a certain timeframe would be more like it. And I already explained the reasons. Allow me to know my own country a bit better than you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Point me out exactly where BBC says that 17N had the silent support of the Greek people, if you can.
17N wasn't considered a danger, and that explains the things I already mentioned. From this to liked or to silent support there's a great distance, wouldn't you say?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|