 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
You might want to read the "lame excuse for an opinion column" again, as the author's core premise is very much not that the Wright Brothers are somehow being "denigrated". His premise seems to be that their achievement, along with the achievements of many other white men, are being ignored in a push to play up the achievements of minorities and women in the interest of diversity. |
Urh, and he is "proving" this premise how? By saying the Wright Brothers are being discredited--his discussion of the Wrights takes up half the piece, and is in the title. But does he offer even ONE example of this happening? No. Point stands.
quote:
He never said that, either. Strawmen sure are fun, though, aren't they? |
I even quoted this before. 
"That part of the United States is often referred to disdainfully as "flyover country" because it is part of America that the east coast and west coast elites fly over on their way to what they consider more important places. But they are able to fly over it only because of those mechanics in Dayton."
That is a pretty clear statement--without them, he asserts, we couldn't fly over the country. Now, do you believe that's true? I certainly hope not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
This is a funny thread.
Just the other day I was thinking, "Cali hasn't posted a ridiculous race-baiting thread in a while... I hope he isn't sick or dead or something."
Gotta hand it to you, Cal... you are the straw that stirs the drink.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: Man had dreamed of flying for centuries and others were hard at work on the project in various places around the world when the Wright brothers finally got their plane off the ground a hundred years ago, on December 17, 1903. |
It seems pretty obvious that the author thinks flight would've been invented without the Wrights, given that he mentions the work of others around the world toward the same goal. |
So what if they were working on it? Coupled with his earlier statement you're so quick to dismiss, this doesn't make the caveat you claim. He doesn't say here "others were working on it and would have done it anyway," does he?
Regardless, the context of which this particular item was being discussed was in response to Cali's assertion that the article is about how some groups are "distorting history" for an agenda. My response, citing this one example, is that it doesn't help the author's case when he does the same thing.
As MtG pointed out, the Wright Brothers achievement is a bit distorted in standard history, at least through ommission. They were, in reality, two guys among many significant pioneers who helped advance the science of aviation. Their contribution was significant and deserves credit, but the degree to which Sowell here tries to laud them goes to the opposite extreme and undermines his entire point.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|