 |
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
I'm sorry, but I might as well be asked to build a nuclear reactor before explaining even pseudo economics to morons. Here's a post from a person in another forum who pisses me off; and the post istelf pisses me off as well and I don't know why.
quote: Who here from the U.S. supported both the Iraq War, AND the huge tax cuts? Quite a few of you, I'm guessing...
You realize what a glaring contradiction this is, don't you?
Even under the rosiest forecasts of economic rebound, the huge tax cuts are going to cost more than a trillion dollars in revenue.
And, at the same time, we're spending hundreds of billions (and who knows how much more) on increased military spending and reconstruction....
How in God's name can you support BOTH???
You all do realize that you are mortgaging your future away, don't you? You do realize that having a crushing debt load will itself inhibit economic growth, right? You know, interest rates...
Are you all the same kind of folks that run up $50,000 in debt on your credit cards at 15% interest or something?
Have you ever heard of fiscal responsibility? Did it occur to you that these policies are the most irresponsible fiscal policies of any president in modern history?
I REALLY REALLY want you all to explain this.... |
What answer would you give to this, in a polite manner. As well - what is the leading accepted train of thought regarding; both by field & institution?
Thank ya
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
*enters cynic suit*
I would reply him that pre-war projections by major banks have indicated that the benefit of oil harvesting from Iraq will totally cover the cost of war within a decade whereas the oil harvesting will continue beyond the 10 year limit.
And then I'd advice him to start seeing further than his nose into the financial future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
(of course I would be lying, or rather not telling the whole truth 'cause unpredictability in how Iraq goes or the whole region or future events can very well change all that - besides Iraq now looks like scenario #3 which was the worse case scenario)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Zkribbler
|
 |
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Feb 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zylka
In other words, you don't know in depth econ either. Great, next |
It doesn't take a genius. Let me explain it to you:
Usually, borrowing is a bad idea. You borrow a dollar from me and have to pay back two. Are you better off or worse off? Worse off--because you're down a dollar.
Sometimes, borrowing can be good. You borrow a dollar from be, invest it, get back the original dollar plus two more, pay me my two dollars and keep the third dollar for yourself. Are you better off or worse off? Better off--because you're up a dollar. 
What has Bush done? He's borrowed more money than any other President in history. Has he invested it? No.
He's given most to the richest Americans, hoping they'd let money trickle down into the rest of America. They haven't. We're three million jobs down and after three years the economy is starting to slog its way back to where Bush took over. Bush squandered the rest of the borrowed money on Iraq. No return on investment there.
So all Bush's borrowing has done it to put the U.S. in the biggest financial hole in the history of humanity. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|