 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
East Street Trader
|
 |
London, United Kingdom
Jun 2000 time: 05:32
|
|
Establishing a rule of law among nations and the institutions to police it is not something that will happen overnight.
Maybe we need a few hundred years for the job.
But the UN has, at least, got established.
And rapid communications has put us all in touch with each other. That is a huge change and does seem to me to reduce mutual suspicions and tensions rather than to increase them.
A consensus did seem to appear that what was happening in the Balkans was wrong and that the world at large ought to do something about it.
We did not stand back and let those squabbles reach their own conclusion.
And no individual nation state charged in.
Some countries participated in what was done more actively and some less. But there was discussion and I do not think anyone would describe what happened as a war between nation states.
I thought the establishment of an international court to try those whose conduct had fallen short of what is expected to-day from political leaders was, in particular, a sign that some idea of a rule of law among nations might be starting to emerge.
And none, I think, dissented from that.
Now what happened in the Balkans was, perhaps, a much clearer case. Because the former Yugoslavia had disintergrated. Which, perhaps, made sovereign immunity less of a deterent to taking action.
But once it becomes accepted that wanton killing on a large scale is unacceptable then that principle will get itself applied within a state as well as when a state disintegrates.
So my answer to how the hell that happen is for all of us to demand of our political leaders that they only resort to force when they can forge a consensus in the UN.
And we develop the code of conduct that administrations must abide by as all systems of law are devised by argument in the UN.
Whether I am right to think that a code of conduct for the administrations who rule countries will emerge by that method over time or not I do not know. But it will stop wars between nation states in the meantime.
And if we are going to need a few hundred years to work these things out the really urgent thing is to avoid such wars in the meantime.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
The reaction in Nassiriyah ( a mainly Shiite city in southern Iraq) Via Oxblog
"It took about 30 seconds for THE rumor to spread through our compound. THE rumor, if true, would be the biggest story in Iraq: we had Saddam.
It took about 60 seconds for the first celebratory gunfire to begin. It hasn't stopped. It is now so constant that all of our workers--who had already stopped working and forced their way into our normally off-limits kitchen (where our TV is)--came in to watch the news. Its probably better that way...the sky is raining bullets. I gladly stepped aside for them to watch--this is their day.
It took about 5 minutes for every car in Nasiriyah to grind to a halt, horns honking, people getting out and dancing in the streets. I kept thinking to myself "I hope this one turns out to be true..."
It took about 20 minutes for an official here to get through to Baghdad and confirm that the news was true."
This is the last bind to their terrible, recent history, and that bind has now been cut. The people here are ecstatic. People are dancing in the streets, honking their horns, firing weapons non-stop, smiling, hugging, and lord knows what else.
There's still a lot of work to be done here, but for the first time since I've been here I think I'm going to take a lengthy break in the middle of the day, and just kinda enjoy myself with the Iraqis that work here. I feel so very fortunate to be here, among them, as they celebrate. "
|
|
|  |
 |
|
East Street Trader
|
 |
London, United Kingdom
Jun 2000 time: 05:32
|
|
I do not contend that what happened about the Balkans was a perfect example of police action in support of an established rule of law. Nor would I, or anyone, hold up the UN as being effective.
The thing to say about the UN is that it has managed to stay in existence long enough to have got established.
Which is to say a good deal. It is a newish idea. It's predecessor, the League of Nations, failed altogether. But even that was an advance over the situatiuon when there was no such body.
So we have the chance to build on something. Inadequate as it yet is.
And while I agree that there was a period when no-one was doing anything about the Balkans what finally was done had the support of a large number of nation states and was actively opposed by none. Even those targeted by the intervention pretty well came to acknowledge that what was done was necessary.
Nothing like that had been done before and, once again, there is something which could be built upon.
NATO has lost its reason d'etre but the role it fulfilled in the cas of the Balkans was a good one. The pre-existing political and military arrangements allowed co-operative police actions. And the need for a wide consensus distanced what was done quite a lot from narrow state self interests.
Maybe each continent needs a NATO>
Anyway, faltering as these steps may be they seem to me to provide the beginnings.
The Iraq war, by contrast, just takes us straight back to war between nation states. Governed solely by real politick
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by East Street Trader
I do not contend that what happened about the Balkans was a perfect example of police action in support of an established rule of law. Nor would I, or anyone, hold up the UN as being effective.
The thing to say about the UN is that it has managed to stay in existence long enough to have got established.
Which is to say a good deal. It is a newish idea. It's predecessor, the League of Nations, failed altogether. But even that was an advance over the situatiuon when there was no such body.
So we have the chance to build on something. Inadequate as it yet is.
And while I agree that there was a period when no-one was doing anything about the Balkans what finally was done had the support of a large number of nation states and was actively opposed by none. Even those targeted by the intervention pretty well came to acknowledge that what was done was necessary.
Nothing like that had been done before and, once again, there is something which could be built upon.
NATO has lost its reason d'etre but the role it fulfilled in the cas of the Balkans was a good one. The pre-existing political and military arrangements allowed co-operative police actions. And the need for a wide consensus distanced what was done quite a lot from narrow state self interests.
Maybe each continent needs a NATO>
Anyway, faltering as these steps may be they seem to me to provide the beginnings.
The Iraq war, by contrast, just takes us straight back to war between nation states. Governed solely by real politick |
The Govt of Yugoslavia was NOT a member of NATO. As far as it was concerned, NATO was just a collection nation states. Governed soley be realpolitick. No different from the coalition of the willing acting in Iraq.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|