 |
|
Admiral Sparky
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Whoha
wouldn't heavy autofire AP mass drivers be better then env fusion beams at the appropriate tech levels vs class 3 shields? considering that the drivers hit 1 shield face rather then all of them |
Actually, knocking down all 4 shield facings causes them to regenerate a HELL of a lot slower, which means that over the long run, you spend less time wearing down shields. And AP is crap vs. Heavy Armor and/or Reinforced Hull.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Iasius
|
|
Germany
Jan 2003 time: 05:32
|
|
Shields regenerate by 30% IIRC, but this is only for one side, so if you knock out frontal shields they'll be back to 30% next turn. If you knock out all shields they'll all be back to 7.5% next turn.
It doesn't make much difference if you use enveloping or other weapons against regenerating shields, the damage they can take after they've been down is the same. The initial damage they can take is higher for enveloping weapons though.
I've been playing telepathic a lot lately, so I always go with fusion beams instead of rifles and I select shields or ecm jammer instead of mass driver therefore I've been using fusion beams a lot lately. They are also nice for to OBCV because they can be continous which adds +25 instead of autofire which subtracts 20 and your miniturization path also includes battle scanners.
If I'm creative I usually use mass drivers though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|