 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pekka
Dr Strangelove, yeah, it goes both ways.. |
There are places down here where the old way of doing things lives on.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:32
|
|
I haven't read all the posts in this thread, but I can tell you that I was once that 4 year old (not specifically the same, but close). Tell your friend to never give up. Always fight for her. It will seem hopeless sometimes and he will tragically miss a lot of his daughter's life. But if she's got anything like a good head on her shoulders, no matter how indoctrinated she is, one day she will realize what has happened, and she will reject her mother and return to her father. She has physical and legal superiority over her daughter now, but one day she will be an adult, and she'll have no more power over her than her daughter chooses.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Mazarin
|
 |
of Old Europe
Nov 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
Yeah, the law seems broken on this one. Especially since parental obligations and rights can no longer be tied to biological parenthood (surrogacy, IVF, etc.).
Some kick-ass lawyer needs to expose these laws.
Here's a chance for Imran Siddiqui esq., lawyer of Georgia, to show his quality. |
Here are some definitions from German laws:
(I'm translating this one myself, so there can be errors due to not entirely correct translation)
from the BGB:
quote: §1591 Motherhood. The mother of a child is the woman that has born it. |
surrogate motherhood is illegal,
quote: §1592 Fatherhood. Father of a child is the man,
1. who is married to the child's mother at the point of the child's birth
2. who has acknowlenged the Fatherhood or
3. whose Fatherhood has been ascertained by a court according to §1600d. |
The fatherhood can be contested (if a married woman has been unfaithful, for example) and equals biological fatherhood in these cases; semen donators(voc.?) are not protected by German laws: if the woman can find out who it is, he will have to pay for the child.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
there is a reason why women are generally awarded custody in the U.S. (and in Canada) |
There are a lot of reasons why women usually get custody in North America and Western Europe but fitness as a parent isn't often one of them.
1 A societal assumption that women should be the ones to raise children.
2 Men have historically earned more money so it is in the child's interest that it lives with her whilst he pays for it. This also saves the government money in social security payments to women with poor career prospects because they dropped out of work to have children.
3 Womens rights groups are better organised than mens rights groups.
Basically, it used to be because men worked and women raised children and the law supported that arrangement. That presumption has now been hijacked in favour of the economic benefit to everyone else of fathers working and paying.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TheStinger
In the UK, maintenace from the Father is not an issue in contact cases |
No, it is now dealt with by the Child Support Agency, possibly rivalled only by the Inland Revenue for its incompetence in dealing with its "clients".
In a way that makes it worse as the courts rule on access arrangements, and any enforcement of them, completely separately from maintenance and child support payments.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|