 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:32
|
|
.. I just came back from an old buddy of mine who I haven't seen in a while. He's a daddy of a 4 year old girl.
He got divorced, well actually the mom divorced him. It didn't work I guess, I know he's a good guy so there's nothing nasty to it, but it didn't work. When my buddy came from work, there was nothing but a note 'I'm leaving, I'm taking the kids with me too'. What a day, huh?
Anyway, like being a reasonable human being, she didn't ever negotiate or talk about the situation more than that, she just left and took the kids. And like in most cases, it came be surprise. He was heartbroken, he can't see his daughter. There was no court orders to not let him see it, and he went to see them to the 'new home' which btw already had a 'new man' which made it clear what happened in the first place. Naturally I symphatize my friend, even if the facts were screwed up, but I try to stay with the facts.
They don't let him in. They don't let him see the kids. But, she does want the monthly pay check, and denies she's with a new supporter, but I believe my friend who says she's with a new man, because she lives with him.
There is about nothing he can do about it. Now it's christmas, and he again remembers what happened, spending it alone, only trying to reach his daugher to say few words. Today I was there, and he showed the gift he was trying to give her daughter. Naturally, she's always ordered to her room so there would be no contact what so ever. So, he left the present anyway to their doorstep. It came back, with a note that I saw 'don't try to bribe my daughter you bastard'. Bribe? How about a christmas present? And he tells me she's feeding BS to the kid, like that he'd be a bad man and lies. I know he's not a bad man.
This is what I think happened. She found a new man and fell in love. The previous relationship wasn't working so good, so she thought she'd start a new life. Taking the kid. Denying the fathers right to see the kid. He can go to whatever court orders but if she won't co-operate, it's pretty much just a piece of papers.
It struck me how evil people can be. And also, that justice doesn't care about fathers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Why can't he go to court? I don't know about Finland, but in the US the infidelity of one partner could be considered an argument against that person's fitness to raise the child.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Given that Pekka recently posted on how lenient the Finnish judicial system is on people who commit violent crimes I wonder how many people get so P.O.d with this kind of situation that they lose it and simply kill the ex-partner?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:32
|
|
Laws favor mothers way too much here in the States, too, or so it seems.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:32
|
|
Chemical Ollie, I hope your brother wins the case, looks like things are looking up to him though... these things sucks and I imagine it was hard times... Maybe I'll understand it better when I have own kids, but it didn't look easy on my buddy so I kind of have a feeling about what it might be.
Yeah, that trick is awesome! I can't do it anymore that good, and I never was very good anyway but I fooled few people for few seconds... I was drunk at Uni party, and said to these chicks I never seen before from another department I can hover and you know all drunk, finally got them to watch me after several pleads and 'go away' answers, and failed miserably. It was horrible, they didn't even laugh at me but were more like 'yeah what a loser'
The other Blaine tricks are impressive too.... the hover one is maybe the most difficult one, and also it doesn't work so well on people you know.. Blaine works up the trick so good people freak out.... sets them up so good.
The 540 grade hand still continues to amaze buddies though .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
OTOH my brother's daughter lost custody of her pre-school aged son two years ago. She married this guy when she was a teenager, but he abused her. Heck, he even fought with her right in front of my brother's family and my family one Christmas. The boy was exposed to this violent treatment of his mother throughout infancy and toddlerhood. The guy eventually walked out on her, leaving her to raise the kid. The kid became a little hellion. At age three he tried to smother my daughter. I've attributed his behavior to having been exposed to violence at an early age. Two years later the ex-husband remarries and then sues for custody of the boy. He uses reports that my niece's then boyfriend hit the child as a pretext for removing the child from her custody. The funny thing is that it turns out that the recent boyfriend had been a friend of the ex-husband's and was an employee of the ex-husband's father.
One of our female employees had a similar experience. Her ex-husband had abused her, then walked out. She got a restraining order requiring him to keep his distance from her, despite which he managed to enter her home, remove her baby, and then when followed back to his home brandished a firearm at her. When the case went to court the judge decided that the child should simply stay with whomever currently had custody, which at the time was the father.
What ties these two cases together is that both occurred in rural settings and that in both cases the fathers' parents had personal connections the county judges.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|