 |
|  |
 |
|
Whoha
|
 |
The TOC is supposed to be classified guys...
Dec 2001 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
I can't wait for an "air cop" to fire his weapon in the plane and hit a window, thus depressurizing the plane 
Again, a brilliant idea. Why don't the risky flights just get cancelled, when we know they are risky? |
thats generally not the way physics works, ever push a needle through a balloon? did it explode immediately or did the air very slowly escape?
It works the same way with airplanes:
"If a bullet were to penetrate a pressurized airplane, the passengers would not be sucked out the windows from "explosive decompression." That is a persistent urban myth originating with the 1964 movie, Goldfinger, starring Sean Connery as James Bond.
Airplanes already have holes. Air is constantly pumped into... and out of... the plane. (Otherwise, the passengers would suffocate.) The size of the hole (the "outflow valve") depends on the size of the plane, but it is a big hole. A 9mm/.357 caliber bullet makes a hole with an area of 1/10th of a square inch. (Area = pi R squared.) The effect of a bullet hole on cabin pressure is not enough to be measurable.
Explosive decompression only occurs with huge holes. In 1986, a bomb blew a 20-square-foot hole in a TWA 727 over Athens, and 4 passengers were killed. In 1988, an 18-foot section of the roof came off an Aloha Airlines 737 mid-flight, and one flight attendant was killed. (Both planes landed safely.)
If the Goldfinger Syndrome were true, the Airline Pilots Association would not have voted to arm pilots, and the FAA would not be talking about armed sky marshals.
It's a myth, OK? It was just a movie.
Mark Moritz"
http://www.thegunzone.com/091101/goldfinger.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:33
|
|
I don't oppose this idea. However, I think we are now very close of using 'all the means' there is that we can still accept.
Terrorism threats are way too easy to create. You can basically just start a rumour. You can call to airport. What ever. You'll be caught likely, but hey, buttholes are everywhere. This all costs money, and makes it difficult for the travellers, not so much to actual terrorists. NOT this idea though, this won't limit anyones travelling or make it more difficult though. But some other means that come in the future will.
Imagine if there would be few terrorist strikes in Europe and we come up with extreme security measures, that are not ever taken away? Then we are all ****ed up, and terrorists have won, hands down.
But I have nothing against this idea, as it doesn't limit the individual traveller..
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: If you add the Seattle - Vancouver area |
Too small; what's the point of taking a train for such a short distance? You might as well drive... |
And if EVERY Seattlean/Vancouveran followed that thinking, then the roads from both cities would inevitably be so clogged up that a dead horse would be a faster mode of transportation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sprayber
Who would pay for all these people? |
Consumers no doubt.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:33
|
|
seattle already has a clogged highway system...
a train from portland to seattle to vancouver would be cool though
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|