 |
|
Zopperoni
|
|
What's more trouble to you?
1) Having everything load with Windows, and close what you don't need?; or
2) Have nothing load with Windows, and start what you need?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alex
|
 |
Brasil
Mar 1999 time: 02:33
|
|
interesting question, zop, and the option (2) would be the real answer for me, but I usually disable all programs running in the background in order to play games, and considering that my comp is a horrible piece of junk I pretty much have to do this (close programs) in order to not steal resources from the games I want to play.
I need to disable *all* of them, including firewall and antivirus (well, I could exclude the antivirus, because its right-click menu only allows me to "disable" it, not to close it). I don't want to be without these programs when I start Windows, and don't want to manually start them one by one, it would be as much of a chore as it is closing them.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|