 |
|  |
 |
|
ixnay
|
|
ACS Staff: 'RoN' Content Editor
|
 |
I <3 etna, omg disgaea fag
Jan 1970 time: 22:33
|
|
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/st...EMPLATE=DEFAULT
quote: Minn. Man Wants Church Donation Back
CLOQUET, Minn. (AP) -- A 55-year-old man is suing a local church because it won't give back a $126,000 donation he gave during a deep depression five years ago.
Marcel Mager, of Cloquet, said he made the anonymous donation during a time of emotional distress and thought giving the church money would ease his pain. His wife had left him two weeks prior to the January 1999 donation. It was nearly their entire life savings.
After five months of antidepressants and counseling, Mager said he asked for the money back. But leaders at the Cloquet Gospel Tabernacle church said no. They had already used the money for new family ministry space.
Mager told the head pastor, the Rev. Richard Doebler, he was not of sound mind when he made the donation.
"I was really confused at the time, really depressed," said Mager, an unemployed optometrist. "I didn't even confide in my wife that I had done it."
The church board held the line: Mager gave them the money, and churches nationwide have historically not given donations back - no matter the circumstances.
Mager quietly lobbied the church board and Doebler for the money to be returned. Years passed, and Mager lost hope for a quiet resolution.
He filed a lawsuit against the church in 2002. The two sides have been exchanging paperwork ever since, with no immediate legal end in sight.
"It's clear they aren't concerned about me, they only want my money," Mager said last week. He decided to go public in the hopes that the church will give back the money.
Mager might have a difficult time getting his money back in court, said Richard Hammar, an expert in church law and tax code in Springfield, Mo. Hammar publishes a nationwide newsletter on church finances, Church Law & Tax Report.
Mager's only hope is to prove he was not of sound mind when he made the donation, Hammar said.
But that can be extremely difficult because families of people with more permanent mental ailments - such as Alzheimer's disease - have failed to get large donations overturned, Hammar said. "He really has an uphill battle."
Even more rare is for a church to willingly give back a donation, Hammar said. "I tell people that if they do that, they better open up an office for everybody to come make their case," he said.
Mager's change of heart is confounding to church leaders because the letter he sent with the cashier's check seemed so genuine, Doebler said.
"He felt some remorse for some past actions and he wanted to make it right with God," Doebler said, recounting the letter. "At the time, we were taking it on good faith that this is what he wanted. It was hard to know what we were dealing with since it was anonymous."
Church leaders feel really bad about the situation, Doebler said. "We'd have preferred to work it out amiably."
Mager insists he didn't donate the money to spite his wife, but merely hoped it would lead to some spiritual relief. In fact, his now ex-wife told the church to keep the money. |
What an idiot. "Well, money didn't buy me happiness so I want it back. Let me try this again"
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Patroklos
|
 |
Back home in good ole Norfolk VA
Dec 2001 time: 05:33
|
|
Maybe if a few days went by and they still had the money in cash. Now they have spent it on the family center, something they probobly couldn't have afforded otherwise, and they don't have the option of returning it whether they want to or not. Does he want them to raise 126,000 more in quarters and ones so they can give it back? Sell half the church back or just give it to him?
It just isn't reasonable.
Last edited by Patroklos on 14-01-2004 at 01:49
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:33
|
|
quote:
If he can show that at the time his mental state made him incapable of rendering a competent decision, then he should get the money back, of course.
|

He donated anonymously, so how could the church know? Most chuches would rather know who their donors are, so they can give them tax credits, but they also respect those who give anonymously in not wanting to recieve earthly praise for their giving. Short of asking every member of the congregation if they donated this large check, and with no guarantee that the person who did would step forward, I think the church had no option but to accept the money.
Secondly, Emperor Fabulous has a good point. That money has been used by the church for good works. They should show the man what has been done with his money, and later ask if he would want all this to be torn down. It's not reasonable to expect the church to repay the man, since the church is not a bank with lots of cash on hand.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|