 |
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drogue
We could try that, but IMHO we won't manage it, and the lack of crawlers from trying to do it may hit us. |
It will still take several years to get to MMI. More then enough time to build a few crawlers and save 330 credits again, especially if we switch to FM in a few years.
quote: Even if we could get both, I don't think all the mins to build it, plus two techs, is worth it. Especially when there are many decent SPs we could get (CBA, CDF, CF especially). |
First off, I guess you know my opinion the difference would be only one tech. Secondly, have you read the quoted post below in the Drone dip exchanges thread? We'll actually be saving lots of minerals by building the PEG.
quote: If we capture all possible PEACE bases, we will have a faction with 20 bases. If we would have to build energy banks in all of those, it would cost 20*80=1600 minerals, and cost us 20 credits maintenance per year. So with building the PEG for 300 minerals, we're saving 1300 minerals and 20 credits per year. That's certainly worth one tech less IMO. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Maniac
It will still take several years to get to MMI. More then enough time to build a few crawlers and save 330 credits again, especially if we switch to FM in a few years. |
But will it take the Drones/Hive several years? 3 or 4 maybe, IMHO.
quote: Originally posted by Maniac
First off, I guess you know my opinion the difference would be only one tech. |
But I think it's 3, so 2 would be the midpoint. IMHO, the Drones would trade if they knew they could sell it to the Hive. The Hive have already offered 2 techs. IMHO the Drones would not trade for it without the PEG, and the Hive would trade with PEACE. Hence we lose three.
quote: Originally posted by Maniac
Secondly, have you read the quoted post below in the Drone dip exchanges thread? We'll actually be saving lots of minerals by building the PEG. |
I have. That's presuming we build Energy Banks in each base. I almost never build them, as they're a waste of time, and bring in little energy, IMHO. Do a comparison with how much ec we get with PEG, and how much without, and compare that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drogue
Personally I think the extra techs from trading the PEG is worth more, but I guess I'm alone in that. IMHO, all that would happen is we get the CBA instead of the PEG, and gain an extra couple of techs. That's a good deal IMHO. |
EDIT: Questions answered when I read the Hive proposal thread!
We are discussing whether to effectively give up the PEG for a few techs. We need a SP and we will get one, the issue is whether the PEG is best, or whether we should hope to get the CBA, if all goes well for us in the next few turns. Also remember that we should not just weigh up the potential gains from having the PEG, but also the potential gains of the Hive or Drones if THEY get the PEG. Can someone look at the infiltration data and find out how much they would be gaining from the PEG?
In the absence of this data, my feeling is that we should just concentrate on the PEG now, and worry about the CBA or something else when we are all closer to being able to build it.
Last edited by MrWhereItsAt on 20-01-2004 at 14:15
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|