 |
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
Well, sea levels take 20 years to rise from when they start, and it takes a few pops first. It would be 30 yeasr time before it works. That kinda rules out the emergency side of the plan 
Then they may just use formers to raise land.
However, if we went for mass min production now, trying to get to very high, in 30 or so years it *could* have a devastating effect. With us having the MCC we have an advantage, and with the CBA too we can't be chop/dropped at all. Leaving them with no alternative but to either outgrow us and go for Diplomatic victor of to build ships.
With the MCC we lose the least from higher sea levels. I say we just try to raise production and go green, possibly getting the NA. We can capture a MW army, capture IoDs from the sea, and use them against the Hive/Drones. They won't expect it, it would mess up their plans, and would be a lot of fun 
I wouldn't say try to get ED, as much as try to raise production as much as possible. We gain in production, can capute MWs (with +3 Planet at 75%? ) and with the NA it makes our army look very good indeed. Obviously switch to Knowledge ASAP though, since with Wealth we lose the all important Morale on it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:33
|
|
Can I summarize the majority opinion as that it's a good idea to aim for high production and as a possible consequence a sea level raise, and also that the CBA and air power should still be our main priority, but if that fails, that the Neural Amplifier and a psi army is a good idea?
GeoModder:
quote: Defense against a MW army is fairly easy as well, it's not so expensive for the other factions to upgrade the units with HT, and where are we then with an army of MW. |
In land combat this is most likely true, though for naval combat, which would grow in importance if we manage to raise the sea level, Isles of the Deep combined with convential ships and choppers would probably give us a much better chance to survive a Hive-Drone attack, especially if the Hive-Drones would surpass us in military technology in the future.
quote: Besides, since there's a lot of sea between us and the Drones/Hive, IoD are better then. |
I agree. Especially if we get the NA, the enemy would face a combat disadvantage of 2 to 3 when trying to attack IoDs.
obstructor:
quote: and are formidable strength, at least until Fusion Power is discovered. |
Reactor type has no effect on psi combat. That's the nice thing about IoDs: even if we fall back in the tech race and the Hive-Drones get fusion much sooner than us, we'd still be able to have a competitive army. 
Last edited by Maniac on 24-01-2004 at 21:29
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:33
|
|
obstructor:
quote: I do not think we can rely on breeding native units for defense forever. I meant, what psi supremacy means if they sent tons of empath troops. |
It would give us a 3 against 2 disadvantage, which is still much better than when defending against conventional weapons, especially when they're boosted with fusion reactors. 
quote: After Fusion Power, we can`t solely rely on Iod, we will need aircraft. |
Of course of course. I was just thinking we should consider a strong psi combat element to our military forces, besides an air fleet, conventional navy etc...
quote: We will have naval dominance, but I mean - Hive + Drones = unstoppable shipyards. |
The Hive already has the Command Nexus, and Drogue says the Hive will build the CBA, and the Drones the CDF and CF. In other words, the naval element is the only advantage we've got. If the Hive-Drones build lots of naval yard, they can challenge us, but they will still be less strong than when we try to counter them on their fields of excellence: land and air.
quote: They will eventually swarm us with empath ships and their pure numbers will eventually outrun us, even with NA. I am sure that they won`t mind losing two or three ships for our IoD just to destroy our psi army. Combining non armoured trance empath cruisers with regular ones, they could beat us with their abbility to easily produce units. |
Likewise we can use our IoDs to destroy their convential heavily armoured ships, and use convential ships to destroy their non-armoured empath ships. So battles would be determined by who can attack first. And since we have 2 more movement points than our opponents, we have an advantage on this field.
Impaler:
quote: I dont realy favor a native life based aproatch but perhaps this is just my personal dislike for native life and preference for tec.
I think our plans should consist of tec trading with Univerisy, Probe Defences, strong Navy, pushing for Fusion, Chop Drop the Belivers when we get the nessary tec and expanding into other unocupied territories. |
In the time it would take to accomplish all that, we'll already be conquered by the Hive-Drones for a long time. We have to face the facts: Hive production is 2.5 times that of us, their labs production is three times that of us and their current tech costs half that of us. The same probably counts in a slightly lesser degree for the Drones. Unless a miracle happens, there is no way our production and research can catch up with the Hive-Drones and no way we can get to Fusion Power in a reasonable time: the Hive-Drones will get it many years before us. So though I would most certainly prefer fusion reactor units over psi units, I think we have to face the facts, acknowledge our technological inferiority and aim for a realistic goal: psi units. Psi units will have a better chance than a convential fission reactor army to defeat a fusion army.
quote: Also I belive that Raising Sea Levels would just give Hive and Drones more coastal bases, as of now we have near 100% coastal, their at less then 25% so they cant fully channel their Economic potential into Sea Unit Production as well as we can. |
Despite having near 100% coastal bases, do we pour all our resources in sea units? No, we let a few bases do all the sea unit production, and let the other bases concentrate on other matters. The same would count for the Hive-Drones: whether they have 25% or 100% coastal bases, they'll most likely only build naval yards in a few bases and concentrate all their sea unit production there.
quote: Also we would losse a great deal of our mineral production if we drowned our continent. |
The Hive-Drones will most likely lose a greater portion of their population, terraformation and mineral production than us.
quote: We also lack SeaFormers to make use of the submerged land. |
As we know of our own potential plans, we can already start concentrating on building sea formers instead of land formers, way before the Hive-Drones start doing so.
Last edited by Maniac on 28-01-2004 at 00:05
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|