 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:33
|
|
that is true, they don't need the south. But if they neglect the south, they better damn well win states like mine. Nevada.
Gore would've won if he took Nevada. Of course the same could have been said about Tennessee and any other state he lost.
But my point is that the south can be neglected, but that puts even more pressure at winning sates in the mountain west, midwest, plain states etc.
A dem winning a state like Nevada ain't easy. I was out of state during the clinton years, so I'm not sure he he took my state both times. But I suspect he did. But normally we are a very conservative state. Although the demographics have changed a bit with the heavy influx of Californians. Although you also have to note that most of the Californians who fled here are more conservative, and tired of paying higher taxes.
In any case the democrats would be wise to try to at least get one southern state. And they have to win Florida imho. And of course get the usual states like California, Illonois, New York, Washington, Massachussetts, Ohio, Penssylvania. Preferribly the entire north east and middle atlantic as well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whoha
|
 |
The TOC is supposed to be classified guys...
Dec 2001 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Care to point out a modern candidate (Lincoln doesn't count!) that won the election without at least being competative (carrying at lest 2 states) in the South?
Who cares about Northern Democrats anyway? The relevent distinction here are Democrat or Republican since the running consensus is that the Democrats would be best served writing off the region as a whole. |
Yea, Lincoln got the 3 way democrat split, he probably doesn't count.
[edit] And this might be how a democrat will win without the south this time. Perhaps Lincoln does count when you consider that.[/edit]
Last edited by Whoha on 28-01-2004 at 07:16
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Mordoch
|
|
Denver, Colorado
Jan 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Evil Knevil
Oh, something else. Didn't Kerry have prostate cancer. Won't that be a big stick to beat him with? |
Nope. He had it much earlier, and I haven't heard a word since then, strongly suggesting its been treated completely successfully. If Bush tried it, it would look like he's reaching for straws, and Democrats would crack jokes about Bush choaking to death on a pretzle.
Some version of prostate cancer is extremely common in older Americans, and people who had had some version of it actually make up a statisticly significant portion of the male voting population. If Bush was not careful he could end up getting some male Republicans to vote for Kerry because they are so angry at Bush for trashing carry since he had experienced a minor case of prostate cancer. A related issue is that Bush could end up coming across as mean spirited.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Tax and spend liberal Kerry and his pal Ted Kennedy ........ you guys are going to hear this till you choke and then they will shove it down your throat along with your own bile...
Is it possible, will the Democratic party self-destruct once more?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: In any case the democrats would be wise to try to at least get one southern state. And they have to win Florida imho. And of course get the usual states like California, Illonois, New York, Washington, Massachussetts, Ohio, Penssylvania. Preferribly the entire north east and middle atlantic as well. |
Totally agree. But I think Kerry plucks Florida and also takes at least one other Southern state (right now I'm thinking Louisiana or Virginia).
quote: are to point out a modern candidate (Lincoln doesn't count!) that won the election without at least being competative (carrying at lest 2 states) in the South? |
Can you show a modern candidate that won the election without at least being competitative (one state for this) in New England.. which it definetely seems Bush will lose every one.
When Bush loses NE and Kerry only wins a few Southern states, something will have to give (and before you point to relative electoral votes remember that Kerry will probably win California... what, you don't think that they suddenly turned Republican because the voted for Arnie?)
And, btw, by the South do you mean former Confederacy or something in addition?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
Are you kidding me??
I thought Yankees would have more in common with the Canadians than the Rebels. |
No, I think the prevailing winds are northerly and so, you know, they get their fill of the Yankee thrill.
Best line tonight was Lieberman happily declaring himself in a statistical three way tie for third place. One heck of a line and you wonder why America balks at electing members of Congress to the Presidency. Lieberman loves to run for two offices at once, I believe he would run for three if he could. He was asked if he would commit to keeping New Hamshire's place in the primary scheme safe and he said sure. What wouldn't he promise?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|