 |
|
randomturn
|
|
NYC US
Aug 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
I've been working on the Kerry campaign -- answering phones, calling voters, etc. And it seems like many of the voters in Iowa and NH want to see a Kerry win and run with Edwards. Even the Edwards supporters seem to want this!
Does anyone think Howard Dean has any chance to win the nomination? Just curious...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
While I think a Dean win is unlikely, I think Iowa showed that his thing can turn suddenly on a dime, and it's way too early to count him out--especially with all the cash he has on hand.
I'm not sure if Kerry-Edwards is the most electable, but it'd certainly rank pretty high.
My gut tells me that I might not like the guy as a President, but my head tells me that Karl Rove and Dubya and Cheney are scared shitless of a Clark nomination.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mordoch
|
|
Denver, Colorado
Jan 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
Kerry-Clark.
Clark comes across as a nice guy, and having two respected ex soldiers will make it really hard for the repugs to impgun their patriotism.
|
Nah, that's overdoing the military angle. You're better off finding two people with more different backgrounds so they have a better chance of attracting different groups of voters to the ticket. Its highly unlikely that the Republicans could make much political headway attacking Edward's patriotism on an Kerry-Edwards ticket. You'd need something alot more substancial than the vice-president simply not having military experience.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
I think Kerry and Clark compliment each other - Kerry is a guy with plenty of experience, knows the issues and is a veteran. Clark is likeable and has youth and is from the south.
OTOH, Clark has some of the better qualities of bvoth (though he's not as likeable as edwards nor does he have the same kind of experience as Kerry.).
I think Clark/Kerry would be the best bet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Mordoch
|
|
Denver, Colorado
Jan 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Honestly, I don't think Kerry can really win the general election, no matter who his veep pick is. He's too northern. |
Frankly, I think barring something dramatic happening, most of the South can be written off as Republican strongholds. Its also quite possible to win the election without carrying most of the South. The one real exception is Florida, but many of the retirees there are from the North, so being a Northerner is not such a liability. If you view that status as being a problem elsewhere, it may be an issue, but I'd argue its pretty much confined to the South. The fact Gore couldn't win Tenessee speaks volumes about how tough it is for a Democrat to currently take Southern States.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Agreed, but I must say there is one caveat here. Had Gore had one state--ANY state--flip to him, he would have won, even without Florida. Bush was declared winner with 271 electoral votes. So the Democrat in November simply has to carry every state Gore did, plus one. I don't know if that's such a tall order. |
Couple of thoughts:
1. 2004 is not the same as 2000. Bush is now the imcumbant, amoung other changes.
2. While New Hampshire, for example, was very close, and could have gone for Gore, giving him the election, it's also worth pointing that the electoral votes of states have changed, with the south now having more votes than it did last time around. A replay of Gore's results plus NH using the '04 electoral map wouldn't give a democratic victory.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
randomturn
|
|
NYC US
Aug 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
this may be kind of nutty, but how about Kerry-McCain? They're close friends, and no Republican has been more critical of Bush. McCain despises Bush for the "illegitimate black child" rumors the Bushies spread in the 2000 SC primary. Granted, some Democrats would be pissed at the choice, but they are also the most likely to vote in any case.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|