 |
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by loinburger
Depends, really. I've been in a lot of classes where I (and the rest of the class) have hated the guy (or girl) who answers all of the questions or asks all of the questions (and he/she has received flak for doing so), yet I've also been in a lot of classes where I've been the guy who answers all of the questions or asks all of the questions yet I've never received any flak for it. It's really just a matter of how much courtesy the know-is-all is showing the rest of the class, IMO -- the folks who answer all of the questions whom I've given flak are the kind of people who immediately shout out the answer, or (in extreme cases) interrupt other people who are trying to answer the question. They're not getting flak because the class is full of anti-intellectuals, they're getting flak because they're honyocks. |
Good point. I'm a fairly intelligent person with fair people skills. When I was in high school I took some history classes, and as I was interested in history I usually knew the answer to most of the questions. Once I figured this out, I would only raise my hand when no one else did. This allowed everyone else their opportunity to contribute to the class rather than it being a dialogue between me and the instructor. Another bonus for me was that I was known for being good at sports and a tough fighter. The sports thing made me popular with some of the guys who also enjoyed playing sports, as we enjoyed the comraderie of working together on teams or the thrill of opposing one another honorably on the field of battle. Being tough kept the bullies who were looking for an easy mark off of my back. Between these various factors I managed to avoid being harrassed by my classmates, something that some of my friends who were more narrowly tailored suffered from.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:33
|
|
Interesting thread. Good read.
Whaleboy; Enigma your hmmm style of "saying" things (I use " because you don't really say on the net do you) on the the net comes across as slightly arrogant. I understand why it does though and don't think you are arrogant. In fact I've gained more respect for Enigma from reading this thread. Not that he would care, I don't expect him to.
Hmmm it comes across arrogant because you guys no want you want to say and aren't scared to say it. It's hard to explain. I've been accused of the same as you people, though I wouldn't class myself as arrogant. Keep up the good thread.
- Flip's vague contribution (just so he can now get notified when this thread carries on)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:33
|
|
quote:
Really? What do you do? And you agree with my point, no?
|
I'm a novelist and people now pay me to write lesbian erotica. Up on my site before the end of Feb hopefully. Yes I do agree, I have a tendency to be verbose, but not to the point of unreadability or irrelevance I hope. You seem to have understood what I've been saying.
quote:
They are for Whaleboy! You are cool enough that you don't need them.
|
Go for it!
quote:
Why do people pick on the stupid or retarded? It certainly isn't anti-intellectualism. Notice that good athletes are rarely the object of scorn on that account, but poor athletes often are.
|
A good point, but one assumes competence. People pick on those who are different in schools, and unfortunately, intellectual means different. You can lump that with the retarded or the losing athletes etc.
Anti-intellectualism is merely symptomatic of a simplistic instinct to attack what we do not understand, be that the intellectual himself or what he is saying.
quote:
Whaleboy; Enigma your hmmm style of "saying" things (I use " because you don't really say on the net do you) on the the net comes across as slightly arrogant. I understand why it does though and don't think you are arrogant. In fact I've gained more respect for Enigma from reading this thread.
|
Indeed, as have I. I do not think I am arrogant, I don't antagonise my friends and I cant think how one can draw that conclusion from this thread, and make anything more than a speculative, at best circumstantial conclusion that I am so.
quote:
Hmmm it comes across arrogant because you guys no want you want to say and aren't scared to say it. It's hard to explain. I've been accused of the same as you people, though I wouldn't class myself as arrogant. Keep up the good thread.
|
Thankyou, it seems that way to me too.
I must say that these cries of arrogance takes the form of this.
Whaleboy highlights an issue, referring to incidents in his own life.
People say "well you may be correct, but its six of one, half a dozen of the other, and the intellectual may be arrogant"
Whaleboy says "fair enough", but people seem to have a predisposition to attack the intellectual (later says people attack what they don't understand, though he would postulate that intellectuals should be respected for going against the grain, that being his personal opinion).
People say that Whaleboy is arrogant and that is the cause of these incidents (his accusers are mostly those who appear to be anti-intellectuals themselves).
Whaleboy denies this
People continue to insist, even though they are flying in the face of what Whaleboy has been saying about HIS OWN LIFE.
Whaleboy continues to deny, and purport his position.
People go on about him being arrogant, starting to include quotes of his that appear to demonstrate that.
Flip highlighted the situation perfectly. I am forceful in what I say, and confident in saying. I do know what I am saying and rest assured that I think about it. This gives me confidence. That does not mean arrogance. I feel able and strong enough to present and defend my views, critically and reasonably. I don't consider myself of superior intelligence but I am being honest when I say that I am reasonably well read and people do tell me that have a philosophical mind. I know my own capabilities. If you think that is arrogance, which is termed as a sense of smug superiority (which I have implicitly denied) then so be it, you only harm your own credibility in making such an outlandish and frankly ad hoc ad hominem.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:33
|
|
Yes, confidence can be mistaken for arrogance alot of the time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:33
|
|
quote:
3. Oh...and "lesbian erotica"? "novelist"? Not good enough of to justify prolix prose or calling yourself a professional.
|
I am a writer, I get paid for it, and it is my vocation. It would seem self-evident that I am a writer. In my own time I write articles as one can see on my website. Still, what is your point? 
[/quote]
quote:
Do you consciously or subconsciously dislike dealing with people whom you consider stupid?
|
I must say that I'm rather indifferent about it. Since I rarely deal with non-intellectuals in a manner that would highlight their "stupidity", I dont see why I am affected by this.
quote:
It is either paranoid thoughts, or just some fantasy of intellectuals that they should be treated like gods because they are smart.
|
I think a lot of it, on the part of the intellectuals irritation with anti-intellectualism is the disparity between the abuse and prejudice, and the perceived importance of their work. Yes, intellectuals see their work, and sometimes theirselves as important, but theres nothing wrong with that since they play such a crucial and individual role in human civilisation imo. That is something I have always thoguht. Furthermore, would you deny that as humans, we simplistically attack whom and what we do not understand? It is quite interesting that those who persist in denying the existence of anti-intellectualism, preferring to highlight arrogance or some grossly overgeneralised point on the part of intellectuals, are appearing as anti-intellectuals themselves.
NEVER!!! 
Diss, you have ...intriguing avatar...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|