 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: When you accuse people of racism for it, then yes, it is. |
Might as well be. It's ultimately some form of bigotry, and it's "PC McCarthyism" to whine that someone might not be referring to the right kind of bigotry.
quote: And I wouldn't believe the Justice Dept is persuing it if something else wasn't involved. |
The current Just Dept. has had more than its fair share of inane prosecutions.
And I don't buy it. If the prosecution can prove that the defendents were giving advice to some Kurdish militants, why can't they prove that the advice was, for instance, involvement in planning new terrorist acts? Surely, they'd have to have some idea of what these people were giving advice on to prove that they were giving advice.
quote: Ramo, et al., the court did not rule that act was unconstitutional because the experts wanted to support only peaceful activities of terrorist groups, but because it believed that "advocacy" before the UN, etc., which is protected activity under the 1st Amendment, is "epert" "advice and assistance" TO the terrorist group.
To me, the court is being highly disengenous and has engaged in bootstrapping. |
No, the court is saying that this particular clause in the Patriot Act is far too vague, and it could be easily used in unreasonabe situations, such as this particular case. Which is an absolutely correct analysis of the law.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|