 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:33
|
|
Do thumbs up and thumbs down gestures really count as speaking?
edit: And I'm not "lost" in Japan, either; I know exactly where I am. In rah's universe, that mistaken statement would merely make you "wrong", but in your universe, it would make you a "liar". For shame, you dishonest ****...
Last edited by Drake Tungsten on 29-01-2004 at 20:50
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Do thumbs up and thumbs down gestures really count as speaking? |
Yes- you had to write the names.
quote: aaawww . . . .
you hurt my feelings |
Mission accomplished- what you said was inane.
quote: You are. Which doesn't bother me, but you've already charged and convicted him without a trial. I don't even care that you've done that. If that's your opinion, you have a right to it. But when you claim it as the absolute truth without absolute proof you're doing exactly what you claim Bush did. Which by your definition makes you a liar.
But that's just my opinion. |
Yes, and why on earth do you insit everyone state "its just my opinion". I have made it clear that due to various arguements, which I have laid out, I believe he lied.
You say I say its absolute truth- interesting, since I do not believe in absolute truth: to build on what Agathon said: given the nature of the information at hand, the sensible assumption is he lied: am I doing what the Bush admin. did? No, becuase I am being honest about the nature of my arguements, not hidding them or misinterpreting them.
I have never asked anyone here to accept what i said as fact, I could not give a damn if any of you accept them as fact- you rah on the other hand are the one putting people down becuase they do not view their statements as you view them. Fine, you think i should say its an opinion. Well, I don't see it as 'just my opinion". If that insult yoour sensibilities, big deal- I have never asked for your approval, nor could I give a damn about it.
But it annoys the hell out of me for people put attack my arguements for inane reasons, then ridicule my counterarguements without having a clue what they were. And as long as people do so, I will retort.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:33
|
|
I disagree that the intelligence agencies were at fault. The CIA and DIA kept saying, there is no way to know for sure. In Fall of 2002, the CIA's omnibus report stated that the information was inconclusive as to whether Iraq had WMDs or WMD programs. There was evidence either way. The NSA, however, rewrote the report to downplay this, and make it appear as if the consensus was that Iraq had such weapons.
Worse, however, was that DoD created a special intelligence group to gather all intel about Iraq, but only that information which was favorable for making the case for war. They did not analyze or vet this info, so even the most spurious of claims were included, which strong counter-evidence was ignoerd (such as the debriefings of Hussein's son-in-laws).
Even before the war, retired intel agents were complaining that the intel agencies were being played by the Admin. The intel community is pissed that they are being made the fall guys for political decision made higher up. Kay may be dutifully falling on his sword for the Prez, but many of the rest aren't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I disagree that the intelligence agencies were at fault. The CIA and DIA kept saying, there is no way to know for sure. In Fall of 2002, the CIA's omnibus report stated that the information was inconclusive as to whether Iraq had WMDs or WMD programs. There was evidence either way. The NSA, however, rewrote the report to downplay this, and make it appear as if the consensus was that Iraq had such weapons.
Worse, however, was that DoD created a special intelligence group to gather all intel about Iraq, but only that information which was favorable for making the case for war. They did not analyze or vet this info, so even the most spurious of claims were included, which strong counter-evidence was ignoerd (such as the debriefings of Hussein's son-in-laws).
Even before the war, retired intel agents were complaining that the intel agencies were being played by the Admin. The intel community is pissed that they are being made the fall guys for political decision made higher up. Kay may be dutifully falling on his sword for the Prez, but many of the rest aren't. |
I don't think that Kay is falling on his sword, he's essentially resigning in protest because his group has been gutted and he can't finish his job. His call for an independent inquiry is anethema to the administration, as it is likely to be extremely detrimental to Bush's re-election campaign. The fact that he is sounding so even-handed makes it that much harder for the administration to resist that very reasonable suggestion. Republicans in congress aren't going to take a bullet for the White House on this one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|