 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ancyrean
|
|
Back to Ankara, Turkey
Feb 2003 time: 12:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
That's not the issue here. The issue is that his religion strictly prohibits him from prescribing the morning after pill because they teach that human life begins at conception.
Now, you've admitted that the pill prevents implantation, therefore, by scientific evidence, dispensing the pill violates his beliefs.
It's not just the employee's speculation. It's his faith and his beliefs. Would you consider all of his faith to be nothing more than speculation?
I fail to see why the store cannot accomodate his beliefs, considering that he is a pharmacist, and his job is not unduly affected by the refusal to dispense the morning after pill.
So all Catholics, who up until now have practiced as pharmacists, should quit their job?
|
I think a society should be based on some predictibility, such as, if I go to a grocery and I have the money, I can buy apples, or, if I have a prescription from a doctor and I go to a pharmacy I can get the medication. That simple. I should have the luxury of not trying to second-guess any pharmacist's religious beliefs.
Law should not sanction the inclusion of religious beliefs, hence religion, into any such transaction. If we allow the pharmacist to be the judge of anybody's life ("Rape? Dunno. I think life starts at conception, I think she'll a take a life if I sell this pill, ergo I shouldnt give it to her"), what's next? If the next pharmacist is a Hindu, should he be allowed to not give me drugs with chemicals derived from say, a cow?
I respect people's devotion to or rejection of religion, but I also think turning basic human interaction into self-righteous trials of conscience is horribly wrong. The conundrum here is, no strong believer would concede that his ultimate truths in fact can be subjective, and the point won't get through, for I'm inherently wrong because I don't agree with the idea that I'll be taking a life if I sell that pill. Hence, he'll demand exception and rights to be able to make that exception.

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
Probably to no extent, as they could blame it onto the Employee or his superior
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:33
|
|
quote:
I wonder, if a woman Ben is close to came to him after being badly beaten and raped, talked out the situation with him confidentiality, then decided despite Ben's best advice, that she wanted to get the morning-after-pill, would he drive her to the doctor's and pharmacy, or would he basically tell her to get lost?
|
Well, you can put my girlfriend into that sitaution. She would not need to drive since there is a 'rape relief' centre on campus. The sad irony would be that she has been vehemently opposed to that clinic, and we managed to get an opt-out clause on our student fees.
I would not take her there, I would not go with her. However, I would not tell her to go away, mostly because I love her and I wouldn't know what to do without her.
quote:
It'd be nice if you could answer that Ben Kenobi, I'd just like to know if you're really human after all.
|
Gibsie: Would you be surpirsed to know that I have lost friends and had relatives no longer speak to me for publicly being prolife? I've been on the receiving end, and I find my real friends now are much more forgiving.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Standup
|
|
quote: Well, you can put my girlfriend into that sitaution. She would not need to drive since there is a 'rape relief' centre on campus. The sad irony would be that she has been vehemently opposed to that clinic, and we managed to get an opt-out clause on our student fees. |
I assume a 'rape relief' centre is somewhere that provide advices, someone to talk to etc (that's what it was at my University) so i'm curious as to why you think you shouldn't contribute to that ? I don't see any contradiction/conflict with your faith here ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:33
|
|
quote:
as morally opposed to it i may be, the simple fact that she would need me to be there, if only for support, means that i ought to be there for her.
|
Any assistance I provide implies agreement with her action.
Consider this. I would marry her in this situation, and offer to take care of her, even if it meant that I would not be able to go to school. That's the offer I'd be giving, that she would have to refuse. I would have already offered my unconditional support to help her take care of the child.
If she rejects this offer, then I'm sorry, but it's her decision, and she has to walk that path alone. I will forgive her because I love her, but the decision is hers.
quote:
assume a 'rape relief' centre is somewhere that provide advices, someone to talk to etc (that's what it was at my University) so i'm curious as to why you think you shouldn't contribute to that ?
|
We fought against the provision of the morning after pill, not the rape relief centre, for the precise reasons you mention. We had no problem with providing counselling for these women, but we could not support the dispensation of the morning after pill.
After the referendum went through, and we lost our proposal to amend, we insisted upon an opt out clause so that we would not be coerced as students to support the rape relief centre.
I don't see any contradiction/conflict with your faith here ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Standup
|
|
OK, i get you - the 'morning after pill' didn't really exist when i was at Uni so i didn't make the connection.
Don't you think though that by not supporting one aspect you're denying a valuable resource as a whole to many people ? I occasionally didn't agree with many things my Student's Union did but i wouldn't want to jeopardise services i might 90% agree with by not funding them ?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|