Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Civilization III > Civ3-General > Idea about strategic resources
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
16.Sep: 7 NEW FILES
15.Sep: TRIAL + NO SLEEP = ONE GAME
13.Sep: PATCH THE PREVIOUSLY UNPATCHABLE

bottom of page
   - CIV3 CONQUESTS $29.99 - CIV3 from $9.99
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
MattPilot is offline MattPilot
Warlord
Tulsa, OK
Dec 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 03:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Idea about strategic resources Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I know a lot of people get mad when they don't have the resource they need, or they can't get it because of resource scarcity (like me .


Well, why not make every unit buildable, but if you don't have the resource it requires, it costs X amount more. I'd suggest a factor of 5, because anything less would destroy the value of strategic resources within the game.

Every resource is available somewhere in the world, though the amount is another question. So to reflect this in the game, each civ should be able to 'scrap' together some resources, but at a higher price. <- thus the longer build time.

So a battleship, for example, wouldn't cost 200 shields, but a thousand. So civs who don't have the resource aren't at a complete loss, and civs who do hold the resource are still at an advantage. Infact, they could build 5 BB's in the same amount of time (given same amount of shield production).


Thoughts?

vmxa1 is offline vmxa1
Deity
Oviedo, Fl
Nov 2001
time: 21:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 04:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

A 70 shields Knight would be 350 shields or about the same as a a wonder. I doubt that would be of much use to anyone.

May work for Sword or some units of 30 or less, but really you would be better of with more archers or spears.

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 04:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

I think this is a Great idea!!

The other way I have looked it, is to establish some kind of world black market (or neutral market) of a percentage of the collective corruption of all civs. This including all strategic resources so they can be purchased albeit more expensively.

Of course this may be all something for Civ 4 or the like.

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 05:01
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Additionally, I would cap it at x2 cost. As well, another game concept is extending 'limits' of certain units like battleships, same as Armies are now.

Jaybe is offline Jaybe

King
Las Vegas, NV USA
Sep 2001
time: 21:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 06:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Strategic Resource availability reflects not only the physical resource, but also the technology and focus to use it. As a player I would always do the "right" or "most advantageous" thing given the technology, but a resource lack adds to the challenge and lessens my control of the situation, sort'a like George W. how feels now re Iraq and the economy.

Xorbon is offline Xorbon
Prince
Guelph, ON
Jul 2003
time: 00:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 09:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by Antrine
...
Of course this may be all something for Civ 4 or the like.


I'm pretty sure somebody with the time could mod this into the game. Just make doubles of all the units, but with higher costs and no resource requirements. It sounds like a tedious job to me though.

patcon is offline patcon
Warlord

Jan 2004
time: 00:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 09:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

I like strategic resources the way they are right now, with maybe two small tweaks. It's a critical factor in why you go to war (to get a resource you don't have but want or deny a resource to an opponent) and how you prosecute a war (to cut off an opponent's supply through trade embargo or route interdiction).
(1) allow a civ to trade away a strategic resource even if it only has 1 or to trade for extra, if it can get a good enough bargain
(2) allow a civ with extra resources to develop a "strategic reserve" to provide that resource if it is lost later, say 1 turn without the resource for each turn with an extra (2 turns for 2 extra, etc.)

okblacke is offline okblacke
Warlord

Dec 2003
time: 21:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 12:47
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Idea about strategic resources Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by MattPilot
Thoughts?


I....don't think I like it. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, I just don't think I like it. I think it would piss me off more than not having a resource.

I think the system could be "fixed" by improving the trade and diplomacy systems.

The problem with a fix like this one, or other fixes that involve making comparable troops, is that they end up decreasing the value of resources.

I dunno. This probably should be one of the more tweakable rules. The "Seven Kingdoms" had a great set-up where you could pick the number of resources (though they were strictly revenue/population generating).

[ok]

Switch is offline Switch
Prince
This just in, water has been discovered on Mars...
Apr 2002
time: 00:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 14:36 Visit Switch's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

Why not just increase the appearance ratio in the editor, if your not satisfied with the number of resources already available? Personally I'm fine with how it is now, but to each his/her own.

MattPilot is offline MattPilot
Warlord
Tulsa, OK
Dec 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 07-02-2004 20:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

thats not the point switch.

The point is to keep resources still rare and important, but allow civs without them to still manufacture those units, but at a higher price!

Switch is offline Switch
Prince
This just in, water has been discovered on Mars...
Apr 2002
time: 00:33
  Old Post 08-02-2004 01:32 Visit Switch's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by MattPilot
thats not the point switch.

The point is to keep resources still rare and important, but allow civs without them to still manufacture those units, but at a higher price!


Oh, sorry...Well, in that case, I have an idea (though it would either require tedious modding or Civ4). For every unit that requires a resource, have another unit that is similar, but twice as expensive and slightly under-powered. I think just having a 2x multiplier on price isn't enough to keep resources viability, but 3x would making the units pointless...if it's 2x but underpowered (though still more powerful than older units), this I think would create a fine balance. Or instead of underpowering it, it could just have 1 attack removed and it starts with only a conscript's HP.

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 08-02-2004 03:38
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

2x cost and conscript if you do not 'own' the resource. Think of the pre-WWII Japanese buying US 'scrap iron' and then later not able to adequately 'improve' production later in the war. I do not know in detail how much 'real' effect this had, however the outcome was a 'turkey shoot'. So at least that's what our pilots 'called it' after awhile.

Additionally, this could be implemented now in CSC whenever you acquire a resource through trade from another AI. 2x cost, conscripts by building units with any resource you don't control, however only have via trade.

MattPilot is offline MattPilot
Warlord
Tulsa, OK
Dec 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 08-02-2004 03:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

thats a great idea guys! I'll add that to my custom game!

Thanks

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 08-02-2004 04:56
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Please share!

How would you carry that out?

MattPilot is offline MattPilot
Warlord
Tulsa, OK
Dec 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 08-02-2004 07:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

dunno if you want that. I've modified everything from citizens to Governments to Resources' bonus.
I will release it as a mod in the file section, but i'll have to continue my tests (been testing 3 weeks now )

Antrine is offline Antrine
Prince

May 2003
time: 05:33
  Old Post 08-02-2004 07:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

My apologies MattPilot, I meant, share how one would make the idea work in any mod, as I too am working on a Ancient World Mod and would simply like some hints as to how to implement this resource idea in a mod.

Many Thanks,

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33.
Apolyton Time is 00:33.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0444 seconds (91.85% PHP - 8.15% MySQL) with 30 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net