 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
The coronation of the LOTM is one more proof that the oscars have went hilariously but also sadly downhill... One of the most boring movies getting oscars.
As I grow older Berlin and Cannes sound more and more exciting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
is it me or do all the commies hate lotr?
this is good stuff
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Diane Lane was, indeed, quite ****alicious.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
-Jrabbit
|
 |
of the Electronic Egyptians
Feb 2002 time: 23:34
|
|
Yeah, I'm a Tolkein fan.
Yeah, I'm a fan of the LOTR movies.
There's some pretty broad-brush criticism in this thread, and some similarly virulent reaction.
Summarizing some of that, here's my view...
1. Re: criticism of LOTR:ROTK because it's too Hollywood...
quote: Well, maybe you guys will realize it someday, but American cinema sucks because of Hollywood's poisoning. |
Excuse me, but this is the Oscars. It's about Hollywood.
The Screen Actors Guild (SAG), Cannes, Sundance, British Film, and the Foreign Press (Golden Globes) all have their awards. So get real, and deal with the Oscars for what they are.
2. Comrade Tassadar talks about how undeserved these awards were, but then states: quote: I tried watching the first.
But I cringed. |
If you haven't seen the movie, you have no say in this.
3. Oncle Boris is quite vehement that this was an unexceptional acievement. According to his standards,
quote: As long as you prepare the cast, the script, the Bible and the layout beforehand, there should be no problem in making a coherent trilogy... (later) Bah, they were following the story of the book. They already had their scenario, the only thing left was to hire peons for the animation, the music, and the acting... (later) What about we take 100 millions and make a movie out of Finnegan's Wake, Waiting for Godot, Voyage au bout de la nuit, etc? |
...there should be great films based on classical literature and excellent trilogies everywhere.
Dude, they're just not there. Good source material is just that, and nothing more. Turning it into a decent script, and turning that into worthwhile theatrical experience -- is actually quite difficult.
4. Re: the ROTK soundtrack...
quote: And the music: yes, it sucks. It's nothing like true classical music... (later) It's a very common music, nothing groundbreaking. It's here to manipulate the viewer, not to make an artistic breakthrough. True, it is EFFECTIVE- but it's nothing like "true" music. |
So if it's not classical, it's not true music? Puh-lease! While I'm not a huge fan of Howard Shore, at least the soundtrack is orchestral -- unlike so much of the synthetic techno-drool we get in many movies. Nice of you to admit it's effective.
Oh, and btw, "to manipulate the viewer" is THE FREAKING POINT OF ALL MOVIE SOUNDTRACKS!
Original music scores done for film are, by definition, not classical music. Get a clue.
5. The sweep by LOTR:ROTK means the Oscars have gone downhill?
Nahhh. C'mon. Nothing has changed. This is no different from the sweep by "Titanic" -- just a better film, with a track record of success, that beat better competition. Nothing succeeds like success, and the Academy has always liked big-scale, grandiose productions, especially when they make a ton of money. Remember, voting is by Academy members, so films that employ a lot of people will always earn more votes.
OK, done now. Back to work...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|