 |
|  |
 |
|
Bosh
|
 |
Taehan Mingook
Jan 1970 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Your anarcho-socialism seems to depend on profit, interest, and I assume rent. |
I'm a gradualist. You can't make profit, interest and rent go away over night. That's not to say that they're good things of course.
quote: Combined with that you deny the need for central authorty. |
Well obviously that's not going to go away overnight either. As you get a more and more egalitarian economy built up the state gets more and more obsolete.
quote: Can you explain this 'egalitarian' banking system, and how you plan to maintain equality? |
To begin with start with something along the lines of Credit Unions and then go more radical from there. The Mondragon bank (its pretty good-sized nowadays) is also a good example of how to finance things although its not perfect either, as are some community development banks that take deposits and invest them back in the community.
quote: How exactly does this work? Who makes the decision, and what is their motivation. |
It works in a whole lot of different ways depending on how far along in the transition you are and I don't pretend to know what's going to be found most effective via trial and error.
One effective tactic would be for syndicalist unions to get administrative control over pension funds and use that money to buy out companies, fund the foundation of new companies etc. etc. But that's just a tactic.
quote: Can an anarchist explain what the transition could be like? I think that's the most difficult point. |
Like with Communists you've got a big split between the gradualists and the revolutionaries. I'm in the gradualist camp. I think a good way of getting things done would be to have Unions with a backbone and control over pension funds, with that money they could just call strikes at companies they wanted to buy out and then buy 'em out when the stock prices get low enough. Similarly there'd be setting-up of co-op organizations for any kind of human institutions and if you get far enough along with that all that's left is to have the different organization coordinate.
quote: I guess social-democracy will be a decent alternative until we find a good transition method. |
Not really. Social democracy is about who gets what rather than who controls what (mostly at least), a better alternative is Worker Capitalism (ie workers own things but things still function in a capitalist framework).
quote: I think that if the labor movement becomes strong enough, it can basically muscle its way into getting capitalists to sell off their businesses cheaply to workers through boycotts and strikes. |
Exactly. Getting control of pension funds would also be necessary to fund the buy-outs.
quote: I think this isn't possible anymore. |
Well you need a Labor Movement that's strong and has backbone. Obviously that's going to take a whole lot of work.
quote: When productive capital becomes less and less industries but more and more about degrees and offices, it has a huge effect on ideology. |
How so?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|