 |
|  |
 |
|
Gibsie
|
 |
all over the proverbial shop
Jan 1970 time: 05:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Mad Viking
2. As killing an unborn child at any age is murder, except for legal abortion- then taking birth control pills is murder. Because contrary to their name, they do not prevent conception. They allow conception, but prevent the "unborn child" "fertilized egg" from implanting on the uterine wall. Thereby "killing" it. And as birth control pills are not recognized as a legal abortion method, we have no choice but to charge the 70,000,000 people using, prescribing,, manufacturing or dispensing then with murder. |
You've gone a bit over the top here I think! Birth control pills can do as you say but to state they don't stop conception itself is incorrect. They hinder the sperm from raching the ovum, and if I recall correctly make the egg harder for the sperm to penetrate.
Anyway, they would simply reclassify birth control pills as a form of abortion... although the most liberal groups oppose classifying birth control pills as such as they feel it has negative connurtations and may result in less people using it (Many of whom would have an abortion if they fell pregnant as a result anyway, d'oh!).
Plus for a charge of murder you need a body... I doubt even the most hardcore Christians would trawl through the sewers looking for fertilised eggs callously discarded to trace back to their murderous owners!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:34
|
|
Well now... this is gotten interesting:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/03/15/c...n.ap/index.html
quote: SALT LAKE CITY, Utah (AP) -- Prosecutors are investigating whether a woman charged with killing her baby by refusing a Caesarean section tried to scam a couple by offering to sell them the non-existent child for bail money, a newspaper reported.
Deputy Salt Lake County District Attorney Kent Morgan told the Deseret News his office was reviewing the allegations from a California couple who said they accepted collect telephone calls from Melissa Rowland from jail.
Rowland, 28, accused of refusing a C-section for her unborn twins because she feared scarring, has been jailed on criminal homicide and child endangerment charges. She has denied refusing a C-section.
In a jailhouse interview Friday with The Associated Press, Rowland said without prompting that she had not tried to sell the babies, but did not elaborate. The latest allegations apparently came after the interview.
One of the twins, a boy, was stillborn on January 13. A girl survived and has since been adopted, but prosecutors say she tested positive for cocaine and alcohol, which resulted in the child endangerment charges. She is scheduled to be in court Tuesday on that charge.
Monday, Rowland pleaded innocent to one count of criminal homicide. She appeared in court via video teleconference from jail, and her attorney entered the plea.
Brian Farley told the newspaper for Sunday's editions that the adoption agency he and his wife were using contacted them about possibly adopting Rowland's baby boy.
The Sacramento couple said Rowland offered to give them a boy if they paid her $5,000 bail. They were unaware that Rowland had already given birth to a stillborn baby boy and thought she was in jail only on child endangerment charges.
Under the assumption their attorney had checked Rowland's background, Farley said he and his wife agreed to accept collect telephone calls from the woman from jail. The calls began February 26 and ended March 2, he said.
Rowland's attorney has said she had a long history of mental illness. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002 time: 05:34
|
|
The DA of Salt Lake City chould be voted out of office than charge with fileing or threaden to file false legal charges and permant disbar from the practice of law and permant disbar from holding any electic or appoint government job for life.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002 time: 05:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
I caught the tail end of a segment on the O'Reilly show last night talking about this topic. Apparently he too believes that the proper action would have been for the doctors to go to a court to seek guardianship; and it is the doctors they are to do so that makes them primarily at fault. |
Than good doctor doesnot want to operate on than person against they will as there is than higher change of then dieing on the table. Most surgin willnot operate on than person who believe they are going to die on the table 90 % of the time they do die on the table, if they can help it.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|