 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:13
|
|
...goes around.
I ban Apolyton for three days.
Three days ago I was banned for acting on principle. I posted in a thread that it was a banning offense to post in so I do not protest my banning. I knew what I was doing. What I was doing was my protest. People were banned for making the mistake of posting to the title of 'The Thread'. I've done that myself and I admit it's a dumb thing to do, but a banning offense? It seemed nasty, or as Ming said, stubborn. In Mings closing post he said that both sides were being stubborn, and then he closed a thread that he said would not be closed. Admitting he was being stubborn and then closing the thread he said he would not close appeared to me to be an admittion he was mistaken in the first place. Which this policy was,
banning a person for posting to a title is not acceptable to me. So as I said, I posted on principle.
MarkG, in a way, admitted there was a problem by banning "the first five to post" for only one day. That's like saying posting to a title is a one day banning offense...that's not acceptable either. It's petty and I'm here to enjoy, not get burried in petty regulations.
Do you notice I keep saying that? If something isn't acceptable to someone who really enjoys the company of his friends, including Ming btw, exactly what can he do? This is a business, all this revolution crap is meaningless, except that it provides hits for the site. However it is a business, and I can treat it as it treats me, because I've got more power than a citizen that can revolt but not leave. I can leave, and I will, and to my friends (if you are given the chance to read this) I say,
I'm banning Apolyton, if I'm allowed I'll be back in three days.
May God bless and keep you well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
first of all, Ming saying both were stubborn was his personal opinion on the matter
My opinion is that both he and I were optimistic on the level of maturity of some people, and of the kind of respect of some other people towards the moderator of this forum
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>I've done that myself and I admit it's a dumb thing to do, but a banning offense?
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>yes, I think that after the ban most people will remember to read more carefully the announcements
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>Which this policy was, banning a person for posting to a title is not acceptable to me.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>let's be specific. the rule was concerning the specific thread.
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>MarkG, in a way, admitted there was a problem by banning "the first five to post" for only one day.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>the first five people were banned by ming, and was an extra warning over the first one. it was one day, just in case someone didnt think he was actually talking serious
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>It's petty and I'm here to enjoy, not get burried in petty regulations.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>I dont think you're so stupid not to be able to follow the rules here. it's not like we have tons of them...
nor was it hard for you to understand the reason behind this rule
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>This is a business
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>this is a fansite, run by fans who get small to zero money for providing a service to the community(and do something they enjoy)
but in the end, I think it is hard for you to understand the simple rules we have here. you're posting this in the OT when you should be posting in the apolyton forum.
moving to apolyton then...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cthol
|
|
"I'm a fucking idiot who complains all the time."
Oct 1999 time: 07:13
|
|
maybe so, but the forum needed a little excitement, and it got some. And the revolution didn't hurt anyone.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ming
|
|
Well IS, I did say that. And I believe it too. But, when I break rules, I accept responsibity for any punishment that goes along with my actions.
I constantly ignore the speeding limits in this country when I drive. And, when I get caught, I'm very polite to the police officer (he is only doing his job), and I accept my punishment. I don't complain or whine about it, because I know I was breaking a rule/law.
When I enter somebodies home, I like to know what the house rules are. I would never want to offend my host, even accidentally. Some people have some really silly rules in their homes... but I respect whatever those rules are, because I am a guest 
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Ming (edited May 09, 2000).]</font>
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Mad Monk
|
 |
of Ice Cream
Mar 2000 time: 23:13
|
|
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>But, do you break every stupid rule you see. Do you always do things people tell you not do? And do you expect to get away unpunished? Try that in the real world, and you will get punished.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
An interesting question. No, I don't break every stupid rule I see, but I do break some of them; I'm sure you do too, especially those that you're unaware of. The legal code here in the U.S. is chock full of stupid rules that people break every day--they just aren't enforced. How did these laws come to be ignored?
There is a huge, worthwhile debate hiding in this, but my time is short so I'll just say this: in breaking stupid rules, you demonstrate their stupidity to those in power and to the public in general. This is a good thing, because it prompts those in power to recind bad rules and create better ones.
In respect to Lancer's self-imposed banning, I respect and support it, but will not follow, as I would prefer to discuss this topic while it's still fresh.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Cyber...
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>(snip)...an ad hoc rule was made that was impossible to maintain and in the eyes of most people a silly one and very overdone.
A very minor thingy. Some people just showed their disrespect for that rule, and later much more people showed their disrespect for the punishments that were given for breaking such a small silly minor not important weird rule.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
The first few people posting there (Karsten c.s.) clearly did it for fun and were well aware of the consequences. IMO Ming reacted very well to it, banning them till after his next day afternoon nap. I was really LMAO and was going to say something about afternoon naps. Only when I scrolled further thru the thread I saw the usual spammers, obviously there to make trouble and I decided not to post. And then, to my surprise there were a lot of what I consider serious posters (including you and Lancer) protesting for the right of people to **** things up? Now I agree with you that the admins/mods didn't handle things too clever but I guess they were caught by surprise. If I was in their shoes I would be too and there definitely would be some permanent bans for the ones who deliberately tried to mess up my site just for the fun of it.
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Huey (edited May 09, 2000).]</font>
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
permanents bans? are you joking?
even a day's ban is a crime against humanity! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
That's why it's a good thing this is your site and not mine 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by MarkG on 05-09-2000 12:42 PM</font>
My opinion is that both he and I were optimistic on the level of maturity of some people
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
Really? On the OT?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha he he he he he he ho ho ho ho
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Never compromise what you believe.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CyberShy

|
 |
Delft, The Netherlands
Mar 1999 time: 06:13
|
|
Ming,
Years ago I used to drive my bike very often (I got a car now, so I hardly use my bike anymore) and I never got light on it. (light on bikes is a pain ! it works 2 days, and then just stops working)
We dutch are supposed to have light on our bikes. I've been catched without light very often. Mostly the police dudes said "This is a warning, next time...." you know ?
Sometimes there are rules, but they're never enforced. Sometimes such a status quo is needed. It's like drugs here in the netherlands. They are officially forbidden ! But no-one will ever be punished for using it ! It's impossible to keep on forbidding it since just that much people use drugs, but ethics say we have to forbid it so we can keep on fighting the big guys in the drugs world.
Hell, you keep talking about us that we should accept our punishment. I did ! I hoped in advance you would turn your mind, but I accepted it. That I start a discussion about it doesn't mean I don't accept it. I DID sin against the rule. No discussion about that. And for that reason I DID DESERVE that punishment. No discussion about that.
But deserving something and getting something = 2. I deserve the "Apolyton Shy dude of the Month" title but never got it you see !?
Now plz free ghen.
He's a good guy and just reacted to the situation. Now he's banned 3 weeks or something for something that started as silly as for everyone.
I can't judge about the others, but I know about my fellow enemy atheist ghen that he's a good guy.
I hope you guys will see that merci isn't showing of weakness but that it's showing how strong you are ! Forget about the american "he who has the power should use it" culture and use the more civilized european culture rule: "the dude with most power is the one that 's most relaxed on the rule"
CyberShy
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
|
Lancer posted the following on ACOL
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>Well, I just banned Apolyton for three days...,
As usual when banned and lacking in maturity the banned hurled an insult...MarkG this time... The thread is in the Apolyton Forum 'Lancer on Banning - What Comes Around...' and although when I posted in 'The Thread' I was respectful, and although when I returned from my ban, I banned Apolyton in a respectful manner...I wasn't dealt with respectfully. Unfortunate, but from what I've seen at Apolyton over the last few days, not entirely unexpected.
Perhaps Mark has 'Administated' his offensive remarks by now, but if you check all my dealings with the Admins or Mods they are very respectful throughout this whole mess.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
Lancer, calling apolyton a business is not very respectfull, when it is not. You can not make characterizations like this when you dont know the three things related to a business: how much we have worked, for how long, and how much we have earned. You only know one thing: how good or bad our (free) service is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by CyberShy on 05-09-2000 06:43 PM</font>
Now plz free ghen.
He's a good guy and just reacted to the situation.
...
I can't judge about the others, but I know about my fellow enemy atheist ghen that he's a good guy.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>he made a third dl on sunday after I had announced the penalties to post "hey mark, you missed one my logins"
what did you expect me to do after that, and what kind of precedent would I give if I let it be?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by CyberShy on 05-09-2000 01:50 PM</font>
lines like: "My opinion is that both he and I were optimistic on the level of maturity of some people"
and: "I dont think you're so stupid not to be able to follow the rules here. it's not like we have tons of them..."
are really not applicable for this situation!
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>line 1: lots of other people(aming them some who posted on the thread) characterized their act as stupid, dumb, etc. immaturity, especially when we're talking about a thread like that, is not far away
line 2: I mean it. Lancer has proven all this time not to be so stupid not to be able to understand the simple, common logic, rules that we have here
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>that was impossible to maintain
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>not impossible at all. it was maintained for 40 logins. point proven, thread closed...
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>and in the eyes of most people a silly one and very overdone.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>did you make a count on that, to say "most"?
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>A very minor thingy. Some people just showed their disrespect for that rule
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>actually, they just wanted to test the limit. we made the error to give them a new toy to play...
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>and later much more people showed their disrespect for the punishments that were given for breaking such a small silly minor not important weird rule.
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>and from that kinf of people I expected to follow one of the basic rules of forums, dear cybershy: POST IN THE RIGHT PLACE
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OhWell
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio USA
May 1999 time: 05:13
|
|
I have pretty much backed Ming and the administration on most of the little Apolyton crisis's in the past, but this one is just beyond belief.
On my browser, the last line that shows up without scrolling is "This thread is meant only to point out this new rule." That "sounds" like the end of a post. The line "ANYBODY THAT POSTS TO THIS THREAD wanting to discuss this issue (or just posting their normal spam) will get a vacation" is off of the bottom of the screen.
I was out racing Saturday and noticed the thread that night when I was checking e-mail. I already knew about the 150 limit, so I didn't bother to read the whole thing. I hadn't noticed the do not post here line.
My point here is that (IMHO) this was a poorly designed post. The "killer" point, that posting in the thread earns a vacation, was not immediately obvious to someone opening the thread. So a casual reader could easily miss that point. Especially if intending to post on the second page. The restriction on posting in the thread should have been the first line in the thread.
That said, most of the people who did post were fully aware of the edict not to post in the thread. Those using double logins to post were way out of line. However, I feel that the "damage" could have been reduced by simply locking the thread when it became obvious that is was acting as a magnet for "misbehavior". IMHO, that is what Ming should have done rather than setting up a situation that resulted in the banning of almost 30 people.
This whole issue is an incredibly silly thing to cause so much upset (on both sides of the "issue" . But, then again, I always have been attracted to Apolyton mainly for the comic value. I haven't been disappointed yet! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Mad Monk
|
 |
of Ice Cream
Mar 2000 time: 23:13
|
|
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>Lancer has proven all this time not to be so stupid not to be able to understand the simple, common logic, rules that we have here
not impossible at all. it was maintained for 40 logins. point proven, thread closed...
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
Oh, where to begin? Markos, what are you trying to prove here? That your neck is stiffer than everyone else's? Yes, Lancer is not too stupid to understand the rules, that was never the point! The point was, the rule was not logical to begin with. It was as if the speed limit of a stretch of highway suddenly dropped by thirty mph. People are used to posting on anything that hits OT, and such a rule out of the blue could certainly be expected to be missed by some, ignored by others, and protested by still others. What Lancer, myself, and certain others did was in response to the treatment of those who honestly missed it, because there was no way to expect it.
As for your second comment, all that proves is that you're willing to support unlogical, nonsensical rules to a unjust extent. That is a hallmark of tyranny.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|