 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
The game ran like crap on my then-state-of-the-art P3 600 w/ TNT2 Ultra 32MB.
Was too annoying to play. |
Try running it *now*.
There are plenty of good games that are ahead of their time.
Deus Ex 1 is still ahead of its time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nostromo
What's a R500-based GPU? Something like a 9800 XT? Or the next GPU by ATI? |
The Radeon 9700 was R300 (DX9, 8-pipeline) , Radeon 9800 was R350 (DX9, 8-pipeline, but faster), R400/R420 is the chip coming out in a couple weeks (DX9c, 16-pipeline, insanely fast).
The next chip after that will be R450/470 (expected to be DX9c, 16-pipeline, tweaked and even faster).
R500 is the chip series after even that. New technology, even faster speeds. R500 is roadmapped to be used in high-end PC graphics cards in late 2005 at the earliest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nostromo
|
 |
Montréal, Québec
Mar 2002 time: 00:35
|
|
The diagram is a fake or an out of date internal document.
quote: However, a number of sources who are familiar with Microsoft's console development say that the diagram is not an accurate reflection of the information they've received from the company about Xbox 2 - and could easily have been put together by someone with basic hardware knowledge from publicly available information about the forthcoming system.
"It's not impossible that it's a Microsoft document," one expert told us this afternoon. "But some of the figures seem very suspect, and the information included on the diagram looks to me like it reflects the available information about Xbox 2 rather than being a sensible set of information to put on a document for developers."
He voiced particular concerns over the fact that while the document notes "256+ Mb" of main RAM, it doesn't state what kind of RAM will be used - a vital technical point - and also noted that the CPU diagram doesn't mention that the CPUs used will be dual-core (effectively making Xbox 2 into a six processor unit), another important factor.
"There's a lot of detail here about stuff you could just guess or which we already know from public announcements, like some performance information about ATI's graphics chips. And then there's some really surprising missing detail, like the twin-core architecture and a few other really crucial things which Microsoft has already talked to developers about but are missing from this diagram. I'd have to guess it was a fake," he concluded.
Other developers familiar with the Xbox 2 architecture also voiced misgivings about the diagrams, with one pointing in particular at the information about the processor cache on the document as being inaccurate. "We've seen stuff about the cache on those CPUs from Microsoft, and this isn't it," he said. "If this isn't a fake, the only thing I can think of is that it's an old internal document that was a work-in-progress and never meant to be seen outside Microsoft." |
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/conten...me=dev&aid=3364
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Felch
|
 |
Germantown, Maryland
Sep 2001 time: 00:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by loinburger
Ultimately, it all comes down to game selection. PS2 beat the pants off of XBox1 in that department, so it just remains to be seen if XBox2 makes a better showing. (It doesn't matter how well the XBox2 runs Halo2 -- if Halo2 is the only worthwhile XBox2 game, then I'll be getting a PS3.) |
nostromo is right. It's not the broadness of the selection, but the depth. X-box has a great selection of incredible games: KOTOR, Halo, Morrowind, Ninja Gaiden, Splinter Cell, and even the highly ambitious Steel Battalion. While PS2 had GTA and some other decent games to itself, the X-box is certainly not any slouch.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|