 |
|  |
 |
|
Rohag
|
|
Without knowing your gaming history, likes and dislikes, it’s not possible for me to advise you properly. I can tell you that I’ve enjoyed both games, I prefer RoN, and now wouldn’t think of returning to Age of Kings/Conquerors.
The people at Big Huge Games, RoN’s developer, didn’t work on the Age games. RoN is its own design and plays differently from AoK; they represent two different RTS recipes. If you want, you can read at length the information here and elsewhere in RoNdom. My own hobby page contains my thoughts, though I’ve never specifically contrasted RoN with AoK.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Leonidas
|
|
AoK is a pretty cool game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
rkrempel
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pythagoras
Why should I get RoN instead of, say, Age of Kings? I'm an interested consumer interested in getting RoN. Should I get it or just go spend $20 to play Age of Kings? |
Well, these are both basically games that let you controll losts of small stuff on your screen which you can use to kill lots of other small stuff.
The main difference in RoN is that it's also a well-designed game. I'm not talking about the overall product but about the mechanics. There is much more internal balancing to RoN than in any other RTS I've seen and less redundancy as well. In RoN you have to do everything and use everything or you'll likely lose.
What that comes down to is that RoN is a much more difficult game to get really good at. Just beating off the AI in a skirmish can be very tough.
Personally, I like that in a game, but if you're just interested in seeing your hordes kill the other hordes and have no preference for genre (in which KoC obviously differs from RoN), I guess either will do.
Ragnar
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|