 |
|
|
I don't think a lot of people will be for the idea. My guess is that most like the fact that all the posts appear on the same page. The tree-structure type boards tend to have a lot of posts/posters which are ignored.
|
|
| |
|
|
Builder
|
|
<font size=big>NO!</font>
|
|
| |
|
|
|
That format is outdated, absurd, hard to read, work-heavy, and extremely unsuited for large forums. I'm with Stefu on this one.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
I'd like to associate myself with Snapcase's comments. I don't think I particularly need to add anything.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Changing to branching threads would be a disaster. Would ruin the forums. And I believe Dan and Markos have previously said no to this.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Builder
|
|
And I hope they will say no again.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Mao
|
|
Apolyton
Jun 1999
time: 00:13
|
|
They work this hard on the UBB and you want them to change now???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Nope, sorry, not at this time.
----------------
Dan; Apolyton CS
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Well, even though I hate the idea, I'll provide some 'moral support'. Branched threads aren't too bad in a small forum... but at Apolyton they'd be a disaster. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
What was the old colour scheme like? Was it the one with the black background, like the CtP strategies page still is?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lews Therìn
|
|
Dragonhold, England
Sep 2000
time: 05:13
|
|
Branching topics would be nice -- if this was the Usenet.
------------------
Thus spake the Dragon
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13.
Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2000 08:22
|