 |
|
Dank
|
|
Well I guess we are going to remain only 5. I and DD were hoping for more but I guess this will give us pleanty of time for next years get together. But there is still time if more want to come this year. 5 is a good start I think but more would be cooler!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Deity Dude
|
|
Westland, Michigan
Aug 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
Ive got a newcomer to the game that I am trying to talk into playing - Ill keep you posted.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
civ2guru
|
|
If we only have 5 people and plan to play 3 games each, one per day, we will have one person left out. I suggest one person volunteer to be the referee and supervise/moderate the games to try to make thing as evenly matched and fair as possible. You know, no one starting with extra technologies, no one starting in a vastly superior starting position, etc. I would be willing to do that - I think I'll still have some fun even though I wouldn't be playing. A 4 player tournament will take 3 days to play if you assume one game per day. The fifth person would throw that "perfect" fit off.
Of course, we could also take Joe's (Weldingrod's) suggestion and play a 5 way for 3 days on a big map.
Oh, by the way, I am willing to volunteer for the referee position if we decide to do that one. But I also like the 5 way idea.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Deity Dude
|
|
Westland, Michigan
Aug 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
if those are the 2 options - I would say lets play a 5 way game for 3 days - Id rather see everyone playing
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caesar Jon
|
|
Nice thought civ2 but playing a continued game for 3 days sounds great. I think we should be able to get a whole game in. The only problem I see with this idea is it will be either a close game or a runaway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dank
|
|
I also like the 5 player 3 day deal also. We can take breaks to eat and at night there may be something cool to do around the city. Detroit is a great town and the out of towners should get a chance to see it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bizzaro1
|
|
Hmmmmm, this could be fun, not sure I can work it out on this notice, but what the heck. Don't carve it in stone, but I'll see what I can do.
I do agree, however that with less than 8 a 3 day game sounds best, but then what do I know lol.
Bizzaro the bizzare
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dank
|
|
Where do you live man? And for sure show up....we are gonna have a great time!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bizzaro1
|
|
I currently reside in Flint, Mi. Dank.
Biz
p.s. Sounds like a blast, but it still requires moving some things around, if you know what I mean.
b
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dank
|
|
Flint!!...kick a** you are so close man......try to make it!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caesar Jon
|
|
A premade is fine by me. I trust Joe & Eric.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dank
|
|
Well lets see how democratic we can be. Thats 3 for premade map.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Deity Dude
|
|
Westland, Michigan
Aug 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
I don't play on premade maps
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Deity Dude
|
|
Westland, Michigan
Aug 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
Well let me expand on that answer a little bit.
First of all - I dont think we should make the map larger than 100x100 or even that large. We'll never finish in three days.
Second: I'm not really concerned and in fact don't want a perfectly even/fair start. I don't wanna know for example if I start with 2 resources and a river 4 squares away that everyone else does too. I prefer random over totally equal. Let's let everyone have the abilty to call for one restart if they get a bad start. That will still keep it random and unknown.
Third: I don't want anyone to take this wrong way, because I am not accusing anyone of cheating, But it is impossible to know the map ahead of time and act like you don't.
Thats like telling me the first 4 answers to a multiple choice test are C, B, D & A. And then telling me to take the test fairly. It is impossible. It doesn't mean I am a cheater it just means I have advance knowledge that I can't make disappear from my head.
Sorry guys: no pre-made maps for me. I have no interest in playing in that kind of game. If thats what u guys wanna do - have fun. I'll be there for the other activities but won't be playing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
civ2guru
|
|
Let's have deity dude make the pre-made map. If he is willing to do it...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
civ2guru
|
|
Hey Bizzaro1, you should come and play with us... It would be a lot of fun to have another player.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
civ2guru
|
|
A thought or two on pre-made maps: The purpose is not usually to have EXACTLY the same resources for each person - most of the time it is only to assure some sort of rough parity for people and to avoid some problems that can arise in random map games, like starting too close to another civ or getting trapped on a small peninsula behind someone else who has a nice advantage over you, or something like that. True, in some respects that is part of the game, but in some cases, when stuff like that happens someone has a lost game from the very start no matter what they do. If people are coming from another state to play, it would be nice if they could play a game that was not guaranteed to be a loss for them from very early on. It is a lot of time to invest in something in which you might not have much of a chance to do well at (even if you don't win).
It makes much less difference to us local guys who don't have to travel very far. I want the out of state guys, in particular, to fully enjoy the trip.
I think people will have more fun if everyone has a good shot at playing a competitive game. I personally enjoy it more when the people I am playing against all have a good shot at remaining competitive throughout the game, right up until near the end.
Uncertainty about the outcome for most of the game = More fun
Last edited by civ2guru on 07-08-2004 at 08:11
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Deity Dude
|
|
Westland, Michigan
Aug 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by civ2guru
Let's have deity dude make the pre-made map. If he is willing to do it... |
I have no interest in making a map or knowing the map ahead of time.
I still think letting payers ask for a restart will take care of any bad start problems and still keep the game random and the map unknown
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caesar Jon
|
|
Well i hope this can be resolved. I see DD view and understand where he is coming from. Although I'm driving 7 hours to get to the event it would be nice for everyone to play. I really do not have a clear solution because we cannot settle if we want a premade map OR ai's. I think DD is against both. I say he needs to compromise on one or the other and the rest of us can yeild to the other demand.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
weldingrod
|
|
I vote for a premade map
|
|
|  |
 |
|
civ2guru
|
|
Well, it looks like we have 4 votes for a pre-made map.
I wonder if there is anything we can "give" to Deity Dude - maybe to sweeten his starting spot so that he does not mind playing on a pre-made map. Maybe not. But it is a thought, any how.
Pre-mades have one disadvantage in that the maker knows them, but they have advantages that can really help make a game play better. I'm sure we'll have more discussion on what to do as time goes by.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Deity Dude
|
|
Westland, Michigan
Aug 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
LOL - I don't want to be "given" anything. That logic is one of the reasons I don't like premade maps. Everyone is "given" something. I want a random start where people explore and earn what they get.
Whats wrong with allowing each player a restart? That will take care of any bad start problems and still keep the game random and the map unknown.
As for AI's - again I'm not interested.
I play with a wide variety of players and I don't know anyone who plays with AI's. A few of the 2x2x kingers play with premades in duels but other than that I don't know of anyone who regularly plays on premade maps.
So I may be in the minority in this group but I think amongst most experienced players my views are more mainstream.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|