 |
|
barbeerhj
|
|
"Doughnut worlds" are a good idea in concept: moving from the north pole to the south pole seems very interresting from a tactical standpoint.
This is because moving across the world takes a lot less time when you are trying to move very far south it takes a lot less time.
But, in reallity, a Doughnut world would have no poles, and that seems very unrealistic. This is because a world where you can move from the extreme north to the extreme south very fast would not be in support of a world where poles existed.
-ron
|
|
|  |
 |
|
barbeerhj
|
|
Another thing...
Why do you need to add a picture at the end of your posts Grandpa Troll?
Do you have some file where you keep a random assortment of pictures to add onto your comments in apolyton forumes?
Finally, do you add these pictures in order to make your post more unique and interresting to the reader?
-ron
|
|
|  |
 |
|
barbeerhj
|
|
What?
What does "Hypothemic H3Grw5 Gases being imploded into a Turbine at 135 degrees Celcius" have to do with my questions?
Also, I would rather not see them making another CtP style map come back onto the market with a doughnut world.
-Ron
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Petrus2
|
|
If someone likes donut worlds (or large worlds, or small, or Mr Potato Head worlds) what does it matter to others?
Realistic? First of all it is a GAME. And second of all, not a very realistic one anyway. But it sure is FUN. I prefer to leave realistic at the door when I log on to play a game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Petrus2
|
|
Antrine, that's basically a Dyson Sphere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Antrine
|
|
Yes, that is precisely what I mean, of course I also mean for real. I think that model works naturally somewhere, of course the 'somewhere' part is 'science not so fiction'.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Antrine
|
|
Actually, stronger and stronger propulsion is not desired, due to distance compressed, especially by the central Sun, (which is pure positive polarity). Therefore for flying ships, a magnetic or central core engine that utilizes a precise rotating gyroscope reversing the gravitational relationship with surrounding mass is the order of day. 
No, this brings us the real source of gravity, here on earth and within hollow earth. This is an iron ball some 400 miles thick. The gravity splits in/out from center mass. Gravity is function of mass. They know this (NASA) but disguise it. A piece of asteroid (once part of just such a hollow iron ball) that is about 400 miles long sports the ‘same’ gravity as earth! (I am not here going to bother with the long list references) Remember this is a game! Anyway, same goes for our moon, its gravity is almost spot on the SAME as earth! For the same reason.
All planets are HOLLOW and generally inhabited inside instead of outside! Ours included. That said without prejudice is why I favor the X, Y wrap. 
More sincerely than you might want to realize, 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Petrus2
|
|
f=(1/2)x(mass)x(velocity)x(velocity)
Velocity is the biggest factor since it is squared when determining the force. That's why sci fi talks about hyperkinetic weapons. But it's also scientifically sound (not always true for sci fi!!)
You don't need something a mile long (which probably would break apart anyway) to make a big hole in the ground.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|