 |
What next?
This poll is closed. |
| Progenitor Psych |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Biogenetics |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Industrial Base |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Social Psych |
   |
1 |
20.00% |
| Applied Physics |
   |
4 |
80.00% |
| Xenobanana! / I'm a Pholian |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
5 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Zeiter
|
|
I don't really see the point in going for applied physics unless we are immediately then going to go for NLmath. Because we definitely won't be able to take down Yang's perimeters with just lasers, and I doubt we'll be within striking distance of any of the others any time soon. With NLmath, there's a chance of taking on Yang (as long as he doesn't get plasma armor), but it still seems that our chances for success would be pretty slim. Or maybe I'm just being too pessimistic. Let's see...
With our nifty CC, any impact rovers we built would be at least veteran - thus, our impact rovers will actually be more like 5-1.25-2 rovers. I suppose those could take on a few green 1-2-1's inside perimeters. But then there's the question of how fast can be build a decent size force (4 or 5 minimum, I would say)? Impact rovers are 4 min rows, or 44 mins with our current ind rating. Let's assume in 10 years we have at least 5 bases that we can devote to rover production. With each base producing about 4-5 min/turn, we'd have to wait another 7-10 years for our force to be ready. In addition, only 1 out of those 5 rovers would be elite, the rest would be disciplined.
Best-case scenario: Yang doesn't even have ind base yet (by 2140 - this seems to me to be the earliest possible time that we could be assaulting his bases with impact rovers. Not very likely that he won't have ind base yet). We plow right through him, make him a submissive, and benefit greatly from our gamble.
Middle-of-the-road scenario: Yang has ind base, but all of his units are green. We lose a few rovers, but we manage to capture a few cities. We make decent gains. Overall, the operation pays off.
Slightly worse scenario (the most likely one I think): Yang only has ind base, but he has a sizable number of base garrisons per base (2 or 3) and some of his units are hardened from command centers, and he has a few sensors around. We could probably manage to capture 1 or 2 bases if we consolidated our 5 impact rovers, but we'd lose 3 or 4 of them in the process, and capturing more bases or getting Yang to end the conflict on favorable terms for us would not be very likely. In this case, we would make a slight gain, but measured against what else we could have gained had we diverted our research and resources to something else (like infrastructure, etc.) this campaign would be pretty dissapointing, and would actually make us weaker in the long run.
Worst-case-scenario: Yang has plasma armor. (there's actually a good possibility of this. You know how the AI is a warmonger, especially AI Yang). We're screwed, and we know it. We pilot our rovers back to our bases with our tails between our legs, and realize that all of our military research and production has been all for naught.
The possibility of the last two options is why I vote for going the roughly social psych --> ethical calculus --> gene splicing --> intellectual integrity sort of restriction-lifting, popboom tech beeline with some added goodies along the way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Zeiter
|
|
I'd be perfectly willing to take on Yang if I think we could do it, or even if there was a decent probability of us being successful, but I'm just not that confident about going up against him with impact weapons. Also, here are three more things to consider:
*Considering AI Yang's warmongerer tendencies, it's very likely that we could just probe those conquer techs away from him. And just imagine this: Let's say we research up to gene splicing on our own. Then, we probe high energy chemistry from Yang. Suddenly, we are only techs away from missle weapons and needlejets!
*The last thing we want to do is to deplete ourselves while weakening Yang, but not being able to fully conquer him, making him a nice juicy target for the others later on.
*If Yang is as close to them as he is to us, then Yang is bound to keep the builders on their feet. So perhaps having a strong Yang is in our best interests, because it would occasionally divert the builder's attention from infrastructure to defense.
I have another question: If we want more bases, why not just build more? Conquering the perimetered Hiverian bases seems a bit costly for the end rewards (a few more badly-terraformed, poorly developed bases.)
I agree that, in general, we should do what we do best: conquer. And if we could find another target without those pesky perimeters, then I'd be all for it. Perhaps our foil scouts will find Zakharov on the island just next door?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zeiter
|
|
Well, it looks like I'm in the extreme minority, so it looks like applied physics it is, which I guess also has its merits. Just the fact that we have some advanced weaponry may cause the other human factions to be a little more friendly towards us when we meet them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zeiter
I'd be perfectly willing to take on Yang if I think we could do it, or even if there was a decent probability of us being successful, but I'm just not that confident about going up against him with impact weapons. Also, here are three more things to consider:
*Considering AI Yang's warmongerer tendencies, it's very likely that we could just probe those conquer techs away from him. And just imagine this: Let's say we research up to gene splicing on our own. Then, we probe high energy chemistry from Yang. Suddenly, we are only techs away from missle weapons and needlejets!
*The last thing we want to do is to deplete ourselves while weakening Yang, but not being able to fully conquer him, making him a nice juicy target for the others later on.
*If Yang is as close to them as he is to us, then Yang is bound to keep the builders on their feet. So perhaps having a strong Yang is in our best interests, because it would occasionally divert the builder's attention from infrastructure to defense.
I have another question: If we want more bases, why not just build more? Conquering the perimetered Hiverian bases seems a bit costly for the end rewards (a few more badly-terraformed, poorly developed bases.)
I agree that, in general, we should do what we do best: conquer. And if we could find another target without those pesky perimeters, then I'd be all for it. Perhaps our foil scouts will find Zakharov on the island just next door? |
I'm inclined to agree with your post almost fully. I'd rather beat up on human opponents anyways . I just hope the hive isn't in the way of them. We could try to ally with the hive and get passage through their territory, but that's a long way to travel. And I've never had much luck united the hive and the spartans. But who knows.
If hive is the only faction we can get at, well we may have to attack. But probing him first seems like a good idea, so we know what we're getting into.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|