 |
|
mr Rura
|
|
Slubice
Aug 2003 time: 05:34
|
|
Have you played it? Is it better than EU? The game seem to be quite interesting but I was really dissapointed with HoI and I dont know if it's worth to purchase Victoria.
What do you think about it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mr Rura
|
|
Slubice
Aug 2003 time: 05:34
|
|
well, i played as Britain and I invaded defeated France on the highest dificukt level in ... 1940. Germans were unable to fight France back - all they units were tanks so I created many anti-tank infantry. I used also much tactical bombers to decrease their organization. computer didn't move hardly any fighters to prevent bombarding and produced still tanks, whick were destroyed easily by my infantry. They had twice as much units as I, but they were losing...
IMO AI was good in EU 1&2 but not because Paradox worked on it longer or heavier. HoI is just more complicated and computer isn't able to use all types of forces correctly...
What about patching - I havent' patched it at all, maybe this is the problem...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rubel
|
|
Los Angeles
Aug 2004 time: 21:34
|
|
Yes, read over the Vicky Wiki as mentioned in the previous post.
Read the User-created manual .
It's a differnet game, but the added complexity is a lot of fun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Main_Brain
|
|
Economic World Center
Jul 2002 time: 06:34
|
|
I dunno, I was pretty disappointed at Victoria out of the box.
In Fact the broken Events (Unification of Germany anyone? )
combined with the Horrible Worldmarket & overpowered countries made me so tired of it that I gifted it to a Friend.
On the Other Hand he says at 1.03 & with the Mod VIP (?) he finds it nice.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Damion
|
|
Berkeley, CA
Jan 2002 time: 21:34
|
|
victoria- very long learning curve but very rewarding. I love the game...love it love it love it
damn I have too many games in my life
civ, col, civ2, the other civ by activision, smac, civ3, civ3 tw, c3c, eu, eu2, vicky, smacx, ughhh
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mr Rura
|
|
Slubice
Aug 2003 time: 05:34
|
|
sorry for not ansering, I just didn't have any opportunity to write...
Nikolai - I had patched versions of the games before [patched re-editions after 1 or 2 years after appearance]
and what about quality of Crusader Kings?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nikolai
|
 |
Bergen, Norway
Oct 2000 time: 06:34
|
|
All the people I've seen commenting on the new patch, says that the last patch made it better than before.
Crusader Kings is IMHO a great game, but not as refined as EU2 and Vicky(naturally, it's not as old yet). A few days ago, Paradox opened a public testing of new patches(beta patches where people who wants to try new ideas, come with them and refine them and generally help to make the game better), so it might become better faster from now on. As I see it, it's absolutely worth the price, some people agrees with me, and some does not. It's only one way to find oujt what you will think of it really. 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|