 |
|
Primus Pilus
|
|
i like White on the tile next to the sea mineral (Googlie idea). we need another port and the ouput from the sea rock and land river could crank out units or research. this location would foment my prevalence of force projection via sea power...still need to move CPs south to cover coast against Yang. would the investment towards a Speeder CP balance the cost of more rapid expansion?...btw, i luv drop CPs during mid-game. plop one next to a faction and send in the troops!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Maniac
and the blue tile is IIRC the most productive tile available besides the monolith (which is worked by the 1st worker). |
Good point.
In that case I'll change my preference to purple, with Tomcat-1 moving to plant a forest on its nut tile after completing its current assignment
I'd like to see white as the site for base #7, then - we can't keep delaying getting coastal bases built as we will need probefoil/impactfoil/seaformer launching sites and can't rely on GH doing everything
Last edited by Googlie on 30-07-2004 at 22:11
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zeiter
|
|
I'm gonna vote for purple. With 2 bases producing 5 nuts/turn, we'll be able to pump out the CP's like mad. Blue would also be alright.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zeiter
|
|
White just doesn't have the turn advantage of the others. Also, I don't think we really need another base to produce ships in immediately. We'll eventually colonize white, probably within the next 15 years. But right now growth is essential, and we might as well take advantage of the crater as much as we can. That's why I support purple.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Primus Pilus
|
|
ok, i'll agree w/purple to support pop boom, but white should be next
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:33
|
|
In prior posts these (below map) have been suggested/discussed/agreed as the sites for future bases. (I have only placed 1 additional Crater base. Do we feel that we should fill the Crater's 4 slots before going to the east and west coast?)
Attachment: newbases.jpg
This has been downloaded 15 time(s).
Last edited by Googlie on 02-08-2004 at 09:40
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zeiter
So, wait a second, we're planting base #5 on the Rio Grande? I thought we were planting it 2 tiles north of Sparta Command, at the source of the Eurotas River. |
I thought so too. 
quote: Although that site on the Rio Grande would make an excellent site. |
I agree. 
Regarding wanting less Crater bases or wanting to have them later, we could always found only three instead of four crater bases, allowing us to build more bases elsewhere sooner.
If we'd only build three bases, and build the third on the NE crater bonus tile, an extra advantage would be that the eastern and northern most of the nine crater bonus tiles could be worked by other non-crater bases. For example Santiago Citadel, and a more northern base (base nr7?).
Btw, Googlie, besides the base not bordering to a sea fungus tile, is there any other reason why you would prefer base nr7 to be at the mouth of Río Grande? I'm just wondering because a possible Base Nr7 location as on the attached picture below would have access to a rolling&rainy&river (56.14) and a bonus crater tile (53.15), while at the river mouth the most productive tile would be a 2-1-0 rolling&rainy (55.9). And the fungal tile could be easily removed at a later date if we wanted by a sea former.

|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|