 |
|
Antrine
|
|
Not wanting to be a hypocrite, I have not voted for I do not have Rome: Total War. I have thought favorably about getting it, however was interested in what other Civ players thought, not all the game reviewers.
So, I have not voted and cannot tell if anyone has voted. If someone has voted could you enlighten us to what the count again 'if any is'?
Mayhap, a few more weeks will be more telling...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Antrine
|
|
Here is for an official NEWS update. It is 11 votes for Conquest the beleagered and 6 votes for Rome: Total War.
Of course we are honored by forthright honesty of all 'voters', namely that they are 'veterans' of Conquests (sorry I did not mention that) AND they purchased and played Rome: Total War, not just the demo. (gee, sorry I did not mention that criteria either).
And we have two threads to glean insight from that are of merit. One is posted above that goes to disenchanted R: TW players many who incidently kept making what appeared to be 'favorable' comparison to CIV3 et al. Interesting otherwise they sounded just like us. Imagine that!
And here, in our own forum, guess what, yes that 'other game' forum there is a long thread in honor of R: TW. Now, as a unbiased reporter (trust me ) I am only interested in the facts. Yes, is R: TW worth 50 bucks now? 
Well, this thread above here in our beloved forums I have read twice, and was almost swayed to buy R: TW myself! I know, I know that is hard to believe. Except for one little nagging feeling, yes folks, in looking over the roster of 'traiters' posting I kept getting this nagging dirty feeling, like I looking in to a bunch of whores let loose in a forbidden cookie jar! 
And I know Halloween is coming up, but geeze guys, show a little restraint here. I mean, is it really that good... ?
Well this is the question and I remain 'undecided', however I CAN smell the cookies, and you know, night cometh and sneaking about is going to get easier, especially when the PRICE lowers! 
With piles of smiles... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tau
|
|
Helsinki
Oct 2004 time: 07:21
|
|
I'm not really a wargame fan, so Conquests. Then again, the Total War series is the aristocracy of historical military strategy. Anyways, you can't compare the two. You get the most fun out of Civ by other means than warmongering.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Civfan
|
|
Toronto, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:21
|
|
I got this game when it came out. An amazing game with many elements of civ3 in it. If both games were merged, it would be crazy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002 time: 15:21
|
|
Comparing Rome: Total War to Civ III is apples and oranges.
That said though, I am having a lot more fun playing Rome Total War at the moment. I love watching the battle unfolding, my cavalry mowing down a unit of hoplites in phalanx from behind, the enemy's arrows glancing off the shields of my Legionnaires in their patented Testudo formation, enemy walls crumbling as my sappers dig out the ground from underneath them.
But in a nutshell, both games are suitably epic. Civ III is epic in everything outside of the actual battles, whereas the battles in Rome TW are the most epic experience of that game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MyOlde
|
|
Haliburton, Ontario, Canada
Jun 1999 time: 05:21
|
|
My son just game me Rome Total War for my birthday and from what I've seen so far I'm loving it. But I'm struggling to grasp it all, as a newbie. I don't mean that critically, it's a matter of finding out what everything is all about -- same as in Conquests.
Sir Ralph: your comment "Rome is much better" makes me think you're quite familiar with it. Can you advise me which is the best forum site to hook up with to learn more about it?
Thanks
By the way, I agree that comparing them is comparing apples and oranges.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|