Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Summary of studies: Religiousity and intelligence
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (9): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6   7     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Sprayber is offline Sprayber

Emperor
Dixie
Oct 2000
time: 23:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 09:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#91 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Summary of studies: Religiousity and intelligence Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by Sava
link: http://www.objectivethought.com/atheism/iqstats.html

I found this quite interesting. It only reinforces my own personal opinions about religiousity, religionistas, and intelligence.

So in case you are too lazy to read. Smart people tend to not be religious. Dumb people tend to be religious.

Discuss.


Go smoke some pot Sava

Albert Speer is offline Albert Speer
Emperor
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 12:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#92 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

i'm surprised no one mentioned this (though i did stop reading on the third page) but Bell Curve, anyone? Them niggers were proved to be stupider! now we proved religious people are stupid! YAY!

to Chegitz. nice job consistantly fulfilling my expectations

Jaguar is offline Jaguar
King
Montgomery County, MD
Apr 2000
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 12:45
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#93 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I love it when you just go for broke on trolling Speer. Throwing the n-word around


Speaking of trolling...

Whaleboy, I assume that you're smart enough to know that Mill's definition of a conservative is far different from the modern definition. However, you have that quote in your sig anyway just for the sake of trolling.

Serious post on this thread coming up.

Jaguar is offline Jaguar
King
Montgomery County, MD
Apr 2000
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 12:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#94 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

Alright, the point that I would make in response to this thread is that if smarter people believe in something, that doesn't make it superior.

Smart people generally do well in school. In Geometry, they teach you all about proving theorems. In Chemistry, you have to back up your ideas with observations and the scientific method. In political discussion, which smart people tend to involve themselves in, faith is kept out because a consensus has been reached that religion and politics shouldn't be mixed. The thing that all of these have in common is that they all discourage accepting things on blind faith. Of course smarter people will tend towards atheism, but it's not necessarily because they are willing to be nonconformists. It's the exact opposite. In most intellectual theaters, faith has no place. So naturally, smart people, whose lives revolve around such intellectual activity, are going to be less religious.

So, the high levels of atheism among intellectuals is not due to superior reasoning ability, but to typical human conformity.

Albert Speer is offline Albert Speer
Emperor
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 12:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#95 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

immense stupidity like this thread only deserves a response of trolling... come on now. Sava appears to have this inferiority complex and probably got a smug smirk on his face and a hard-on in his pants when he found this information. yup.

and for you jaguar, it depends on what sort of schooling. Business school or law school grads aren't scientists. would they tend towards disbelief in god as well? your reasoning for 'intelligent tendency towards athiesm' wouldn't quite work for them. they don't worry about biology and chemistry.

Jaguar is offline Jaguar
King
Montgomery County, MD
Apr 2000
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#96 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

For law school, there's the political discussion thing that I already mentioned. People who mention faith in their political arguments get attacked on it. The way political discussion is conducted today favors atheism, because atheists can't be accused of having religiously motivated beliefs, etc.


Also, to go to business or law school, you have to go to regular university first. And let's not kid ourselves about the gigantic bias towards atheism there.

Jaguar is offline Jaguar
King
Montgomery County, MD
Apr 2000
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#97 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

It's late, so I can't promise you that my arguments are entirely coherent, but I think people get the general jist of what I'm talking about.


And yes, it bothers me too when atheists do the OMFFG I am so smart thing. Even though I'm pretty close to atheism right now.

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:07
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#98 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

Good post Jag, I have always been surprised at how close-minded to all things supernatural the majority of intelligent people are. It very well could be an issue of conformity. As a respected member of the internet intelligentsia, I think that even I have conformed and moderated my views on a couple things, just to avoid constant fist-fights with people.

Albert Speer is offline Albert Speer
Emperor
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:08
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#99 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

agnosticism, jaguar... agnosticism and deism... the possibility of god is always there.

Drachasor is offline Drachasor
Warlord

Jun 2004
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#100 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Berzerker
Stefu and Kid are onto something, tagging along with higher intelligence are greater curiosity and skepticism - higher standards of proof. Religion appears to lack the proof needed to satisfy greater enquiry by skeptics, so "Doubting Thomas'" are less inclined to accept a belief in God based on what someone else told them to believe. But frankly, the more intelligent (generalisation alert) have not made a sufficient enquiry into the existence of God to know one way or the other. Simply rejecting religion out of a dis-satisfaction with other people's proof for it is not enlightenment. Look for the proof yourself first...


You know what, this actually has been done many, many, many times. The fact is that any belief in the supernatural *requires* faith, which is belief in the absence of evidence.

Personally I choose to minimize by belief in things that have no evidence for them.

That is simply how it is. I've examined it for myself. I've read the works of others who have examined it. I've spent a lot of time thinking it over.

I rejected religion because it requires a foundation of belief without evidence. Naturally it means that people trying to prove their religion end up having arguements that are lacking, but I didn't reject faith because their arguments weren't good (rather, I rejected faith for the same reason that caused their arguements to be bad).

-Drachasor

Drachasor is offline Drachasor
Warlord

Jun 2004
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#101 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by Verto
Standardized tests show Blacks are intellectually inferior to the Great White race.


This is the same as the Bell Curve, and the Bell Curve does not show blacks to be intellectually inferior to white inherently.

Socio-ecnonomic biases tend to reign supreme in areas such as this, and correlation does not equal causation.

And even if, in this case, being smart tended to make you less religious, that does not mean that someone religious can't be smart.

Some people need to take a beginning logic class.

-Drachasor

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:21
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#102 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Belief in Religionism /= Belief in God

Drachasor is offline Drachasor
Warlord

Jun 2004
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#103 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by monkspider
Belief in Religionism /= Belief in God


But clearly if you don't believe in religion then you don't believe in god. (Religion in the general sense, not the institutions). Afterall, believing in god is a religious belief (there are just other religious beliefs too).

-Drachasor

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#104 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Drachasor


But clearly if you don't believe in religion then you don't believe in god. (Religion in the general sense, not the institutions). Afterall, believing in god is a religious belief (there are just other religious beliefs too).

-Drachasor


Religionism
Own Goals

DAVOUT is offline DAVOUT
King
AUERSTADT
Jun 2002
time: 05:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 13:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#105 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

This theory is useless since abjuration of religious beliefs does not improve your IQ; it could even worsen it if God was angry because you abjured.

Flip McWho is offline Flip McWho
Warlord
New Zealand
May 2002
time: 17:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 14:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#106 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
But clearly if you don't believe in religion then you don't believe in god. (Religion in the general sense, not the institutions). Afterall, believing in god is a religious belief (there are just other religious beliefs too).


Not true. You can believe in God without having any religious beliefs as such. Believing in God is just a belief, religious beliefs start when you start believing in religions. (i.e Catholicism, Islam etc)

Last edited by Flip McWho on 10-10-2004 at 14:10

notyoueither is offline notyoueither
Deity
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 14:19
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#107 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Drachasor
Agnosticism means you admit one can't know for certain one way or another, but always implies a lack of theism. In other words, they don't believe in god, but they admit they might be wrong. Agnostics are atheists.


That's stunning logic. You leap from there is no way of knowing to they know with not a single leg to carry you there.

notyoueither is offline notyoueither
Deity
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 14:29
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#108 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by Drachasor


An atheist doesn't believe in god.

If you are uncertain as to wether god exists, then you do not *believe* that he does. Hence you are an atheist; without active belief in god's existence you cannot be a theist. Atheist is the more general term, agnostics are a particular type of atheist.

All people are either atheists or theists; you either have a belief in god's existence or you do not.

So yes, specifically I am an agnostic, but I shy away from using that term on myself because it is prone to being misunderstood. The term "atheist" typically conveys my position better than "agnostic" to the average person.

-Drachasor


You're full of your own word games. Keep them for yourself please. They don't fit the rest of us.

An atheist believes there is no God. If that is what you believe, then camp there. Don't try to highjack the language to tell the rest of us what we believe or do not.

Drachasor is offline Drachasor
Warlord

Jun 2004
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 15:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#109 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by notyoueither
That's stunning logic. You leap from there is no way of knowing to they know with not a single leg to carry you there.


No, you misunderstand. They have no belief in god:

be·lief Audio pronunciation of "belief" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (b-lf)
n.

1. The mental act, condition, or habit of placing trust or confidence in another: My belief in you is as strong as ever.
2. Mental acceptance of and conviction in the truth, actuality, or validity of something: His explanation of what happened defies belief.
3. Something believed or accepted as true, especially a particular tenet or a body of tenets accepted by a group of persons.

An agnostic does not believe in god. Therefore they are an atheist. "Atheist" is a very generic term:

a·the·ist Audio pronunciation of "atheist" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (th-st)
n.

...One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods.

and:

dis·be·lief Audio pronunciation of "disbelief" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (dsb-lf)
n.

...Refusal or reluctance to believe.

plus:

ag·nos·tic Audio pronunciation of "agnostic" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (g-nstk)
n.

...1.
.........1. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
.........2. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.
...2. One who is doubtful or noncommittal about something.

Unless you are the very rare type of agnostic that believes in god (and in practice I almost never see the word used in this way--though perhaps that is because almost know one is an agnostic believer), then you are an agnostic that doesn't have a belief in god. You are not a "hard athiest" (you don't deny the existence of god--"true" atheist in the above), but you do have disbelief. That's an atheist.

This is predicated on that fact that people either believe in something, or they do not. You can be uncertain as to the correctness of that belief or disbelief, but you still either have it or don't. Now, perhaps I wasn't wholly accurate when I said all agnostics are atheists, but the fact is that most everyone that refers to themselves as agnostics are atheists.

-Drachasor

Drachasor is offline Drachasor
Warlord

Jun 2004
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 15:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#110 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Flip McWho
Not true. You can believe in God without having any religious beliefs as such. Believing in God is just a belief, religious beliefs start when you start believing in religions. (i.e Catholicism, Islam etc)


re·li·gion Audio pronunciation of "religion" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-ljn)
n.

...1.
......1. Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe.
......2. A personal or institutionalized system grounded in such belief and worship.
...2. The life or condition of a person in a religious order.
...3. A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader.
...4. A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion.

Hmm, point, I suppose if you believe in, but lack reverence for, god, then you don't have any religious beliefs.

-Drachasor

Flip McWho is offline Flip McWho
Warlord
New Zealand
May 2002
time: 17:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 15:38
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#111 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Yeah I've always counted that your've got to worship God in some way for religion to blossom. If you don't then all your do is believe.


quote:
Go smoke some pot Sava


Nothing wrong with pot.

It helps you fly.

Flip McWho is offline Flip McWho
Warlord
New Zealand
May 2002
time: 17:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 15:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#112 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Unless you are the very rare type of agnostic that believes in god (and in practice I almost never see the word used in this way--though perhaps that is because almost know one is an agnostic believer), then you are an agnostic that doesn't have a belief in god. You are not a "hard athiest" (you don't deny the existence of god--"true" atheist in the above), but you do have disbelief. That's an atheist.


Refer to that link I posted for an theist agnostic. An atheist commonly denies the existence of God. An agnostic commonly states that you can't prove and not prove the existence of God. There is no automatic denial in there. You seem to leap from the fact that they don't openly believe in a God as a sort of denial.

EDIT: Also as an aside. Sometimes a dictionary isn't the best thing to define something. Hell I remember being told in a philosophy paper that if we use a dictionary to define a term they'll shoot us out of a cannon and into a ship full of dogshit.

EDIT (again): For better clarity, maybe. I think I should go to bed.

Drachasor is offline Drachasor
Warlord

Jun 2004
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 15:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#113 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

With specialized terms, then yes, the dictionary isn't best.

With a more common term like "atheist" it is better.

As you noted I am not saying an agnostic denies that god exists, so don't to to foist that statement upon me.

In my experience (and I was one of the primary operaters of an atheism irc chatroom for many years)*, the term "atheist" is used both to describe those that disbelieve and those that deny.

-Drachasor

*among many other things

Kidicious is offline Kidicious
Settler
Diety of Kidiverse
Mar 2003
time: 21:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 16:30 Visit Kidicious's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#114 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Albert Speer
i'm surprised no one mentioned this (though i did stop reading on the third page) but Bell Curve, anyone? Them niggers were proved to be stupider! now we proved religious people are stupid! YAY!

to Chegitz. nice job consistantly fulfilling my expectations


Yeah, I hate this crap when people try to prove that the're smarter than other people, or look for studies to prove it. It's total bullshit man.

Last Conformist is offline Last Conformist
King
of Calakmul
Jul 2003
time: 06:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 16:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#115 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
And agnostiscism, technically speaking, is a type of atheist.

An atheist is someone that isn't a theist. Agnostics aren't theists. Typically the term "agnostic" is used by people to try to soften the blow of them being atheists (not always the case, but often).

This is semanticist bullshit. The normal definition of an atheist is some who believes there is no god - this does not include agnostics. Etymology is not definition. It's hard to avoid the conclusion you're intentionally trying to muddy the waters.

Last Conformist is offline Last Conformist
King
of Calakmul
Jul 2003
time: 06:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 16:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#116 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

quote:
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
And I know the formula for the roots of a fourth-order polynomial is too complicated for anything but a computer.


That's just pragmatics - working out fourth-order polynomial equations via the analytic formula on paper is so time consuming you're usually better off using special methods suggested by the particular form of the equation*, guessing roots or using numerical methods, while a computer, excelling precisely at crunching numbers swiftly can do it with economical speed. Fourth order polynomial certainly can be analytically solved by hand, and have been done so - so, indeed, was the analytic solution found.

* Only an idiot or a computer would have any more trouble solving x^4+Ax^2+B=0 than a second-order equation.

Drachasor is offline Drachasor
Warlord

Jun 2004
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 17:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#117 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by Last Conformist
quote:
And agnostiscism, technically speaking, is a type of atheist.

An atheist is someone that isn't a theist. Agnostics aren't theists. Typically the term "agnostic" is used by people to try to soften the blow of them being atheists (not always the case, but often).

This is semanticist bullshit. The normal definition of an atheist is some who believes there is no god - this does not include agnostics. Etymology is not definition. It's hard to avoid the conclusion you're intentionally trying to muddy the waters.


I know etymology isn't a definition, that's why I used the dictionary.

The normal definition for an atheist is someone that disbelieves or doubts the existence of god. That includes almost everyone (in my experience) that identifies themselves as agnostic. Perhaps there are many more people that are agnostics that do believe in god, but they must identify themselves as something else first and foremost (because I have only very rarely met one, relative to the agnostics). Few are the people that believe in god and say there is no proof he exists.

I am sorry there is a large overlap of the term "agnostic" and "atheist", but that's just how it is. Everyone is either a theist or an atheist; it might comply with etymology, true, but it also complies with the dictionary definition. One either believes in god, or one does not.

You don't like how the word "atheist" is defined in the dictionary, well, that's just how it is. Dictionaries are *based* on common usage. While some agnostics that don't believe in god greatly dislike being associated with the term "atheist", that is simply the term they applied with. If you ask the average person off the street: "what's the word for someone that doesn't believe in god?", they'll say "atheist." That's how the dictionary gets its definitions (very roughly speaking, of course).

I have already admitted I overstated the case when I said all agnostics are atheists. However, as I have said above and before, most people that call themselves "agnostic" are indeed atheists. The agnostic theists are very rare.

I think you need to stop confining "atheism" to a word that means someone that denies the existence of god. It is much broader than that.

-Drachasor

Last Conformist is offline Last Conformist
King
of Calakmul
Jul 2003
time: 06:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 17:19
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#118 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

I'll admit I don't know what the average American on the street's usage is; you might be right on that point. But the usage atheist="someone who believes that god does not exist" is what everyone around me uses, and by far the most common one in online debates including Americans that I have participitated in.

The AHD defines "atheist" as "One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods", BTW. The implication is that someone who does not a fixed opinion whether God exists or not - an agnostic - is not an atheist. This puts some doubt on your claims for common usage.

Moreover, someone who believes that God exists but say they can't prove his existence would not be called an agnostic where I come from; few if any of the Christians I know offline would claim they can prove God's existence.

Elok is offline Elok
Prince
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 17:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#119 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

Hmm, we're told that the majority of scientists are atheists, and by stunning coincidence, a study conducted by scientists reports that atheists are intellectually superior. What are the odds of that? Wowwwww.....

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 10-10-2004 17:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#120 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Jon Miller
that is because computers are dumber than people

really high level theorists use their mind, just use computers for simple but tedious calculations

Jon Miller


They're already better than people at algebra and most calculus.

 
Pages (9): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6   7     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.
Apolyton Time is 00:21.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0698 seconds (91.79% PHP - 8.21% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net