 |
|
Kalahari
|
|
Blaine, WA, United States
Mar 1999 time: 05:13
|
|
Well, that's kind of extreme there. I don't think that SMAC is only average, I think it deserves a rating in the 90's but it probably should not have gotten a 98. Although it is great, I don't think it deserved to be rated higher than Civ2 just on the basis that SMAC was not nearly as original in its concepts as the original Civ and Civ2. I think SMAC deseved between a 90 and a 94.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mr cairo
|
|
Kingston, ON, Canada
Mar 1999 time: 05:13
|
|
I'm with you, monolith. Diablo was big-time fun and D2 looks great so far. Lets just hope the cheaters don't take over b.net like they did with the original.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BigBadJakk
|
|
Well, heres my game reviews
Civ2 = 99%
Diablo = 90%
TA (Total Annihilation) = 95%
Starcraft = 91%
SMAC = 86%
Half-Life = 96%
SC3K = 83%
C&C2 = well, gee, if they would release the thing maybe I could review it
Haven't play CTP yet, looking forward to it, but I'm a little worried with the mixed reviews its been getting. I sure hope it lives up to it though, SMAC was seriously overrated, it is Civ2.5, with a story in the back. I also wish WW would have waited awhile to start the hype machine on C&C2, they should have been able to see a 6-8 month delay coming, unless they overlooked something seriously wrong with the thing.
My 2 cents...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Pythagoras, go play more games. You'll find there are quite a bit of negatives about SMAC.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|