 |
|
Drachasor
|
|
Well, I just thought I'd see what people think of Moral Relativism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachasor
|
|
Moral Relativism is the concept that one culture's moral/ethical system isn't any more valid than any other cultures. More generally (and even more controversially) that one person's moral/ethical system isn't any more valid than anothers. In other words, moral systems are only true in regards to the group that holds it as true.
IMHO, it is full of crap, and I haven't met anyone that has ever really believed it.
Oh, and Utilitarianism is far from a Moral Relativism stance. The former holds that happiness is the absolute good, and hence one should try to increase happiness and decrease suffering for all as much as possible. That ain't relativism.
-Drachasor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachasor
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
Utilitarianism certainly is not moral relativism, and I wouldn't even call moral relativism a valid ethical code. |
Indeed, it is more like an evaluation scheme for ethical codes: namely, one ethical code isn't any more valid than another.
-Drachasor
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drachasor
Moral Relativism is the concept that one culture's moral/ethical system isn't any more valid than any other cultures. More generally (and even more controversially) that one person's moral/ethical system isn't any more valid than anothers. In other words, moral systems are only true in regards to the group that holds it as true.
IMHO, it is full of crap, and I haven't met anyone that has ever really believed it. |
It's obviously true. A statement such as "it's wrong to kill people" can only be derived from experience or from pure reason. It's clearly impossible to establish "it's wrong to kill people" from experience - you can observe that killing people causes pain, etc., but there's no experiment you can make to determine whether or not it is right or wrong. It is equally clear that you cannot make some proof of a moral statement such as "it's wrong to kill people" a priori, without assuming, as your premise, that "it's wrong to kill people" (or "it's wrong to cause pain", but you get the point). Therefore, all absolute moral statements are dogmatic.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|