 |
|
loinburger
|
 |
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999 time: 00:19
|
|
By that reasoning, you can turn anybody into a single-issue voter by applying a sufficiently broad/fuzzy label to their political opinions. If somebody's voting for Bush and is, let's say, opposed to affirmative action, in favor of emergency deficit spending, in favor of foreign inverventionism, opposed to the land-mine ban, and is pro-choice, then just say that they're anti-liberal. If that same person is voting for Kerry, then just say that they're anti-conservative. Voila, you've got yourself a single-issue voter.
Last edited by loinburger on 02-11-2004 at 06:37
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachasor
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Now we get to loinburger's point.
How can you be a 'good' person and vote in favour of abortion?
Obviously your opposition isn't that good of a candidate. What's his position on non-Russians? |
Just answer the hypothetical question!
A person that is very good in your view except for the issue of abortion.
Or someone that is quite vile except that they are against abortion.
-Drachasor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachasor
|
|
Let's say he doesn't believe in slaughtering others, and doesn't believe in killing at all (anti-death penalty too). However, he also believes that there must be a state religion taught in all public schools and that heresy should be punishable by law with jail time. Beyond that he has a horrid economic policy, wants to greatly limit most social freedoms (from a liberal perspective), and has a belligerant international politics stance.
On the other hand you have a candidate that is pro-choice, has a great economics and social policy plan that would make everyone much, much happier and produce dramatic growth throughout the nation. Wants a strict seperation betweeen church and state, but adamantly defends the right of religious expression otherwise.
Who then?
-Drachasor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:19
|
|
quote:
Let's say he doesn't believe in slaughtering others, and doesn't believe in killing at all (anti-death penalty too).
|
Now were talking. 
quote:
However, he also believes that there must be a state religion taught in all public schools and that heresy should be punishable by law with jail time. Beyond that he has a horrid economic policy, wants to greatly limit most social freedoms (from a liberal perspective), and has a belligerant international politics stance.
|
You don't know me very well. Limiting 'social freedoms' is a bonus, and if he's fiscally conservative, that's another bonus. 
A belligerant international politics stance, isn't really that much of an issue.
quote:
On the other hand you have a candidate that is pro-choice, has a great economics and social policy plan that would make everyone much, much happier and produce dramatic growth throughout the nation. Wants a strict seperation betweeen church and state, but adamantly defends the right of religious expression otherwise.
|
Let's see. Does he believe that your faith checks at the door of the legislature?
Is his economics based upon the redistribution of wealth?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|