 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: What is socialist about trying to start paying down the debt? What is socialist about trying to balance the budget? |
I was talking about high taxes and more social programs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lul Thyme
|
|
Quebec, Canada
Aug 2000 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
You don't see the difference between Latvia and the U.S.?
It could happen if both parties put up a woman candidate at the same time. But I don't think the primary timing will ever allow that. One party will flinch and chicken out, thus forcing the other party not to put their woman candidate up for presidency.
I figure it will be at least another 20 years before we see a female president. |
I would have disagreed with you never statement but you already did yourself.
20 year timeframe or something like that seems reasonnable to me, with what I know of US politics.
I would be a bit more cautious, and say at least in the next 3 elections, (12 years) there will be no woman president.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: Please reread the part about the ideal candidate being a fiscal conservative. Yes, it does help if you argue about what people say and not what you wish they'd say. |
The original post specified a social progressive who would balance the budget. I replied by saying that meant someone who would enact a ton of new social programs, and pay for them by raising taxes. It's still fiscally responsible from a certain point of view, but it also still wouldn't be accepted in the US.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|