 |
|
skrobism
|
|
Long live Arthur Dent!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
skrobism
|
|
Based on the questions raised by "20 Paces" I motion that an investigation be started, or at least that the Emperor Aquavian Lungarius answer to the Senate on his actions.
I formally request to know the circumstances, that led to the peace treaty with the Celts, that now binds this Senate. We already know the reasoning and the results. We also know how the former Emperor views the voice of the Senate. So, most glorious Emperor Aquavian Lungarius, which is it? Did the heathen Celts beg for peace with mighty Rome; or did you seek peace against the will of the Roman Senate?
Long Live Rome!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
snoopy369

|
 |
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004 time: 23:19
|
|
I think part of the problem is nobody exactly understands the definitions of "Senate", "Emperor", and "Republic".
Rome at no point had both a meaningful Senate and an Emperor. Her first emperor was Julius Caesar, although he did not formally claim the title. Augustus Caesar claimed it first.
The Senate in 300 BC ruled Rome directly, as an oligarchy in all but name. They ruled Rome militarily as well as domestically, but in the military their hand was much ... weaker. Two Consuls were always invested with equal military power, their armies the sum total of Roman projected military power; other military forces stayed at garrisons throughout the Empire, which at this point consisted of the Italian peninsula and the beginnings of an advance into Sicily and Iberia. Rome at this point endowed two consuls because she was afraid of the power of a single person; the two consuls had equal power and equal military might, and equal ability to use it. When seperate, they retained full control of their legions; when together, they retained full control on alternating days of the entire force. This often led to comical situations, in which one Consul would support aggressive action and one defensive, and although they would never directly counter each others' moves, they would always seek to reign in the other's actions.
Only rarely did Rome feel the need to place full power in the hands of one man. Cincinnatus, the great Roman general a century and some beforehand, was the first, and perhaps the model for all to come after him, Dictator. Such a man is given control over the Roman forces for a short period of time, in the hope of defeating whatever dire enemy is at hand. Then he relinquishes power voluntarily to the Senate.
Both Consul and Dictator share two things in common: Nearly ultimate power, and an ultimate responsibility to answer to the Senate for their actions. Neither, however, is required to answer to the Senate before the end of their term. Of course, if they wish to be elected a second term (as Consul - nobody would ever be elected again a Dictator), they should follow the Senate's instructions, or else they should show good reason for their acts. However, during their term, they do not generally answer to the Senate, nor do they generally come back at all.
Don't forget, we're talking of a time period when it takes *months* to travel from the "action" to the home city of Rome. Asking the Consul or Dictator to return and check back every so often would be a horrible waste of time and make it impossible to lead ones' forces effectively.
I suggest that we simply ask ourselves: Did Aqualung make the decision he should have made? Given the circumstances (and perhaps ask him these circumstances), should he have done what he did, and would we have agreed with it?
If the ultimate answer is "Yes", then we are agreed that Aqualung has acted in good faith with his post, and we should ask him to continue his course (once it comes up again). If the answer is "No", then perhaps we reconsider his right to the position.
I also suggest we define the position we have made. Perhaps "Emperor" is a mistaken term, particularly if the Senate expects the degree of control some members have expressed the desire for. Perhaps "Consul" or even "Princeps" are better titles?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
skrobism
|
|
Senator Modo:
Your arguments grow weak. It was you who left the northland denfensless and forced Emperor Aqualung's hand. You called the Emperor's courage into question and called him demagogue. Apologize already or face censure! That is unless you have a daughter each of us.
Emperor Auqualung71:
I see that you sued for peace. Although this was against the wishes of the Senate, and you did have time to consult us, I think that the Senate might have agreed with your proposed actions anyway. Peace with the Celts is the course that must now be followed if we wish to defeat the Carthaginians swiftly.
I accept your apology to the Senate. It is a testiment to your courage and honor. I ask that others do the same.
To the esteemed Senate:
I motion that we decide how issues like this (suing for peace and war making) be delt with in the future.
I also motion that November 30 be declared Emperor Aqualung Day. A day to celebrate the prosperity and glory that his reign brought to Rome. Let the Streets of Rome run red with wine! ALL HAIL EMPEROR AQUALUNG!!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
skrobism
|
|
...Great now I have to come up with some legalise. Grumble grumble... Hold on...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
skrobism
|
|
I motion that the Senate vote on the Censure below:
-------------------------------------------------------------
It is the Sense of the Roman Senate that -
On 11.03.2004 06:46, in "The Great Roll of Emperors"; and on 11.08.2004 04:30, in the "Roll Of Senators", Senator Modo44 agreed to live by "The Grand Book of Rome - Our Law". Implicit in these laws is the obligation that the Emperor set an example of high moral standards and conduct himself in a manner that fosters respect for the members of the Senate and Emperors - past and present; and Senator Modo44 has egregiously failed in this obligation, and through his actions has violated the trust of the Roman people, lessened their esteem for the offices of the Emperor and Senate and dishonored the offices which they have entrusted to him.
Be it resolved that:
1. The Senator made false statements concerning the honor and courage of Emperor Aquavian Lungarius in order to cover up his previous failed attempts to eradicate the Celts;
-On 11.03.2004 13:01:
"[I] played too short to see the Celts completely eradicated."
-On 11.22.2004 00:41:
Directed at Emperor Aquavian Lungarius, "Though courage is not one of your virtues, methiks (sic)."
2. The Senator made disparaging statements concerning the honor and importance of this Senate body;
On 11.22.2004 12:56:
"Oh, you mean the long term benefit of making the Senate unimportant in directing the Empire?"
3. No person is above the law, and the Senator even though he is a past Emperor himself remains subject to penalties for this conduct, and called for this censure himself;
On 11.24.2004 11:05:
"go ahead with the censure."
4. Senator Modo44, former Emperor of Rome, by his conduct has brought upon himself and fully deserves the censure and condemnation of the Roman people and the Senate; and by his signature on this Resolution, the Senator acknowledges this censure, and unconditionally apologizes to the Roman People, the Senate and the Most Glorious Emperor Aquavian Lungarius.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
It is my hope that by putting this to a vote we can put this ugly issue behind us and proceed with the reign of Emperor Conius.
Long Live Emperor Conius!
Long Live Rome!
PPP Paddy The Scott, does this get put to a poll or an open discussion on the floor?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
skrobism
|
|
Most honorable Senator ChrisiusMaximus and my esteemed countrymen:
The quote that refers to the failure to conquer the Celts was concerning previous attempts by Senator Modo44 to play this scenerio. His just contempt and desire to rid the world of the pathetic Celts is obviously tied to past failed attempts. Now that he failed again, though understandably so, no one could expect to wipe out an enemy within the first 25 years of our empire, the Senator attacks the Glorious Emperor Aqualung71.
Senator Modo44's statements are that the actions taken by Emperor Aqualung71 have made this Senate unimportant. It is an insult to think that any Emperor could diminish the importance of this great body.
Emperor Aqualung71 did slur the Senate and Senator Modo44 in the heat of debate. It would have been right to call for his censure but the Honorable Emperor Aqualung71 has already apologized if his words and deads insulted this Senate.
Senator Modo44 instead continues to not apologize for his slander against the former Emperor and dares to ask for his own censure.
I say give the Senator what he wants.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|